Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Red carpet fashion in 2002"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from July 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=July 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 22:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Red carpet fashion in 2002====
 
====Red carpet fashion in 2002====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Red carpet fashion in 2002|Red carpet fashion in 2002}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Red carpet fashion in 2002|Red carpet fashion in 2002}}
<!-- 
+
*... that '''[[red carpet fashion in 2002]]''' included transparent bodices and phlegm and dung coloured [[Tulle netting|tulle]]?
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
{{*mp}}... that '''[[red carpet fashion in 2002]]''' included transparent bodices and phlegm and dung coloured [[Tulle netting|tulle]]?
 
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Amanda Spratt|Amanda Spratt]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Amanda Spratt|Amanda Spratt]]
 
:*''Comment'': This may be a bit inflammatory, but it's certainly an attention-grabbing hook...
 
:*''Comment'': This may be a bit inflammatory, but it's certainly an attention-grabbing hook...
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]).  Self nom at 01:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]).  Self nom at 01:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Red carpet fashion in 2002|Mabalu}}
 
-->
 
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
+
:*
  
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  New enough and long enough at the time.  QPQ done. No images to check copyright for. Plagiarism check: [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Flife%2Fenter%2Fmovies%2Foscar2002%2F2002-03-24-fashion.htm&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfgate.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Farticle.cgi%3Ff%3D%2Fc%2Fa%2F2002%2F01%2F21%2FDD239695.DTL&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F1%2Fhi%2Fin_depth%2Fentertainment%2F2002%2Foscars_2002%2F1892305.stm&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2002%2F01%2F22%2Fnyregion%2Ffront-row.html&minwords=2&minchars=13]  Some of these have one to three word descriptions that are the same but the structure is not and I can't figure out how to reword with out changing the meaning. There are some places where I think the neutrality is possibly bordering on... YAY! GO! TEAM! GO! with comments like "had a hit with an Elie Saab dress" and "she was the only star in Chanel" but given the topic and source?  I'm not entirely certain it is reasonable to demand toning this down.  Hook is supported by text and yeah, the sources do support this.  The sources for the hook appear reliable.  Erk.  Yeah.  With some mild reservations, I give this a pass. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  New enough and long enough at the time.  QPQ done. No images to check copyright for. Plagiarism check: [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Flife%2Fenter%2Fmovies%2Foscar2002%2F2002-03-24-fashion.htm&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfgate.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Farticle.cgi%3Ff%3D%2Fc%2Fa%2F2002%2F01%2F21%2FDD239695.DTL&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F1%2Fhi%2Fin_depth%2Fentertainment%2F2002%2Foscars_2002%2F1892305.stm&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRed_carpet_fashion_in_2002&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2002%2F01%2F22%2Fnyregion%2Ffront-row.html&minwords=2&minchars=13]  Some of these have one to three word descriptions that are the same but the structure is not and I can't figure out how to reword with out changing the meaning. There are some places where I think the neutrality is possibly bordering on... YAY! GO! TEAM! GO! with comments like "had a hit with an Elie Saab dress" and "she was the only star in Chanel" but given the topic and source?  I'm not entirely certain it is reasonable to demand toning this down.  Hook is supported by text and yeah, the sources do support this.  The sources for the hook appear reliable.  Erk.  Yeah.  With some mild reservations, I give this a pass. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
  
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
+
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 14:26, 7 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 22:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Red carpet fashion in 2002

  • Reviewed: Amanda Spratt
  • Comment: This may be a bit inflammatory, but it's certainly an attention-grabbing hook...

Created/expanded by Mabalu (talk). Self nom at 01:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough and long enough at the time. QPQ done. No images to check copyright for. Plagiarism check: [1][2][3][4] Some of these have one to three word descriptions that are the same but the structure is not and I can't figure out how to reword with out changing the meaning. There are some places where I think the neutrality is possibly bordering on... YAY! GO! TEAM! GO! with comments like "had a hit with an Elie Saab dress" and "she was the only star in Chanel" but given the topic and source? I'm not entirely certain it is reasonable to demand toning this down. Hook is supported by text and yeah, the sources do support this. The sources for the hook appear reliable. Erk. Yeah. With some mild reservations, I give this a pass. --LauraHale (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)