Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Rodent"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cbl62 (Review and approve) |
imported>Hawkeye7 (Passed - moved to prep area 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from August 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 11:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Rodent==== | ====Rodent==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Gnagarnas tandsystem, Nordisk familjebok.png|100x100px|rodent tooth system]] | [[File:Gnagarnas tandsystem, Nordisk familjebok.png|100x100px|rodent tooth system]] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[rodent]]s''' are characterized by their continuously-growing, razor sharp [[incisor]]s ''(pictured)''? | * ... that '''[[rodent]]s''' are characterized by their continuously-growing, razor sharp [[incisor]]s ''(pictured)''? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[rodent]]s''' are characterized by their razor sharp [[incisor]]s ''(tooth system pictured)'', which have thick layers of enamel on the front and little enamel on the back? | :* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[rodent]]s''' are characterized by their razor sharp [[incisor]]s ''(tooth system pictured)'', which have thick layers of enamel on the front and little enamel on the back? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': Not a self-nomination | :* ''Reviewed'': Not a self-nomination | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]), [[User:LittleJerry|LittleJerry]] ([[User talk:LittleJerry|talk]]), [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) at 22:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]), [[User:LittleJerry|LittleJerry]] ([[User talk:LittleJerry|talk]]), [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) at 22:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough (Good Article passage on Aug 11), long enough, neutral and uses suitable citation format. Both hooks are short enough and interesting. Hooks supported by [http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/rodentia/rodentia.html this] and other sources. Image is from public domain 1908 work. Spot-check doesn't turn up policy issues. QPQ is not required since this isn't a self-nomination. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 20:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough (Good Article passage on Aug 11), long enough, neutral and uses suitable citation format. Both hooks are short enough and interesting. Hooks supported by [http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/rodentia/rodentia.html this] and other sources. Image is from public domain 1908 work. Spot-check doesn't turn up policy issues. QPQ is not required since this isn't a self-nomination. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 20:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 11:40, 14 August 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rodent
Improved to Good Article status by Cwmhiraeth (talk), LittleJerry (talk), Chiswick Chap (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 22:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC).
Article is new enough (Good Article passage on Aug 11), long enough, neutral and uses suitable citation format. Both hooks are short enough and interesting. Hooks supported by this and other sources. Image is from public domain 1908 work. Spot-check doesn't turn up policy issues. QPQ is not required since this isn't a self-nomination. Cbl62 (talk) 20:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
