Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Rogelio Bernal Andreo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>CommonsDelinker m (Replacing Orion_Head_to_Toe_-_Reduced.jpg with File:Orion_Head_to_Toe.jpg (by Natuur12 because: File renamed: File renaming criterion #5: Correct obvious errors in file names (...) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[File:Orion_Head_to_Toe.jpg|100x100px|Orion Head to Toe]] | [[File:Orion_Head_to_Toe.jpg|100x100px|Orion Head to Toe]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | *... that '''[[Rogelio Bernal Andreo]]''' was the first amateur astronomer to win the ''[[Discover (magazine)|Discover]]'' Bad Astronomy image of the year with his image "Orion, from Head to Toe" ''(pictured)''? | |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cancrocaeca]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cancrocaeca]] | ||
:*''Comment'': image released by OTRS | :*''Comment'': image released by OTRS |
Latest revision as of 14:41, 7 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Rogelio Bernal Andreo
- ... that Rogelio Bernal Andreo was the first amateur astronomer to win the Discover Bad Astronomy image of the year with his image "Orion, from Head to Toe" (pictured)?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cancrocaeca
- Comment: image released by OTRS
Created/expanded by Sadalsuud (talk), Casliber (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough, hook is short enough, and the fact has been verified with the online source. As a BLP however, the citation standards are strict, and three fact tags (two addd by me) need to be addressed before this can be promoted. Sasata (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Citations remain a major issue 48 hours plus a week later. Can this be addressed within the next week? BlueMoonset (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, the only remaining unreferenced material was biographical and not hugely essential for the understanding of the article. I have commented it out for now. The article is still over the prerequisite size so should be good to go pending review. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)