Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Romeo Acop"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>PumpkinSky
(prep4)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
====Romeo Acop====
 
====Romeo Acop====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Romeo Acop|Romeo Acop}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Romeo Acop|Romeo Acop}}
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Romeo Acop]]''' is the incumbent [[House of Representatives of the Philippines|representative]] of [[Antipolo City]]'s [[Legislative districts of Antipolo City#2nd_District|Second Legislative District]]?
+
*... that '''[[Romeo Acop]]''' is the incumbent [[House of Representatives of the Philippines|representative]] of [[Antipolo City]]'s [[Legislative districts of Antipolo City#2nd_District|Second Legislative District]]?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Steves Homestead|Edward Steves Homestead]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Steves Homestead|Edward Steves Homestead]]
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]).  Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]).  Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)</small>

Latest revision as of 14:43, 7 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 22:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Romeo Acop

Created/expanded by Arius1998 (talk). Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Nominator is required to submit a quid pro quo (QPQ) review within a week's time, and is reminded that QPQ's are always required when submitting a DYK nomination after the first five. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). BlueMoonset (talk) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg QPQ review is not proper but I am only passing this to clean up the backlog and because some of other QPQs by the user are also incomplete/improper, but he is putting some effort. Article >1500 characters and new on date of nomination. Hook is sourced. I have removed incumbent link to avoid clutter of links in the hook. Samar Talk 15:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)