Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/South African Defence Review 2012"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Annas86
(No)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 2)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====South African Defence Review 2012====
 
====South African Defence Review 2012====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=South African Defence Review 2012|South African Defence Review 2012}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=South African Defence Review 2012|South African Defence Review 2012}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that publication of the final edition of the '''[[South African Defence Review 2012]]''' was delayed for so long that it was retitled "South African Defence Review 2014"?
 
* ... that publication of the final edition of the '''[[South African Defence Review 2012]]''' was delayed for so long that it was retitled "South African Defence Review 2014"?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* '''ALT1''':... that the '''[[South African Defence Review 2012]]''' proposes that the [[South African Army]] should be expanded to three [[Division (military)|divisions]]?
 
:* '''ALT1''':... that the '''[[South African Defence Review 2012]]''' proposes that the [[South African Army]] should be expanded to three [[Division (military)|divisions]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'':(QPQ) [[Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Aldborough (1727)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'':(QPQ) [[Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Aldborough (1727)]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Dodger67|Dodger67]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]), [[User:Nathan121212|Nathan121212]] ([[User talk:Nathan121212|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Dodger67|Dodger67]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) at 09:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Dodger67|Dodger67]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]), [[User:Nathan121212|Nathan121212]] ([[User talk:Nathan121212|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Dodger67|Dodger67]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) at 09:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|South African Defence Review 2012|Dodger67}}
 
* {{DYKmake|South African Defence Review 2012|Nathan121212}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] The article is not newly created or expanded 5x. [[User:Annas86|@NnAs]] ([[User talk:Annas86|talk]]) 01:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] The article is not newly created or expanded 5x. [[User:Annas86|@NnAs]] ([[User talk:Annas86|talk]]) 01:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 
+
:::{{re|Annas86}} The article was moved to mainspace on 27 November. Would you care to rereview this? [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 17:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] After rereview, I find this article is moved to mainspace from user draft on 27 November, so its newly created. Length OK, date OK, sources OK, neutrality OK, QPQ OK, and hook verified. The primary hook is good for me. Ready to go. [[User:Annas86|@NnAs]] ([[User talk:Annas86|talk]]) 02:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 09:03, 17 January 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

South African Defence Review 2012

Created by Dodger67 (talk), Nathan121212 (talk). Nominated by Dodger67 (talk) at 09:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg The article is not newly created or expanded 5x. @NnAs (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Template:Re The article was moved to mainspace on 27 November. Would you care to rereview this? Fuebaey (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg After rereview, I find this article is moved to mainspace from user draft on 27 November, so its newly created. Length OK, date OK, sources OK, neutrality OK, QPQ OK, and hook verified. The primary hook is good for me. Ready to go. @NnAs (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)