Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Insurrection"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
 
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Star Trek: Insurrection]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Insurrection|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Star Trek: Insurrection|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
+
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Star Trek: Insurrection]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Insurrection|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Star Trek: Insurrection|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}}
  
 
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) 17:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC).<br />
 
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) 17:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC).<br />

Latest revision as of 18:13, 10 October 2018

17x17px The following is an archived discussion of Star Trek: Insurrection's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know12x12px (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Ashwin147 (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC).

Star Trek: Insurrection

  • Reviewed: Strapless dress
  • Comment: Expanded from 6930 to 34926, a 5.04x expansion. Image is for the alt hook.

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 22:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC).

  • First off, how the heck could this article ever be a DYK?!?!
  • Anyway, 5.038x expansion to ~35000 characters prose
  • (caveat, looking back, the article has been longer in the past, up to 8707 chars, meaning only a 4x expansion, but I am willing to IAR since it is so awesome to have this article at DYK) Chris857 (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Files appropriately licensed (one fair-use poster), including the one suggested for the hook
  • Cited inline, to apparently reliable sources (and books!)
  • It will take a while to properly look through even a sampling of the article, but a suggestion (also for the GAN) would be a copyedit, as I found some things even in the lead to improve Chris857 (talk) 03:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • You're right. I've de-GAN'ed it for now and instead nominated it at the Guild of Copy Editors. It seemed an easy expansion initially because First Contact was 60,000+ characters. But frankly, if I hadn't stumbled across the Michael Piller book online then this would have been stuck around the 30,000 mark. I wouldn't expect to see any other ST films here soon - Nemesis and Generations are both already above 12,000 characters and so it would be difficult to get them to reach a 5x expansion point without some serious padding. Miyagawa (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • It's been well over two weeks without any further action. Is this article still awaiting the abovementioned copyedit? How soon will it be ready for a final DYK review, or is it ready now? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Its going to be a while until the Guild get around to it as there is a bit of a backlog right now. However, I have just given the article a copyedit from head to toe, so it should hopefully be in good enough shape now for DYK. Miyagawa (talk) 09:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Sorry that I haven't gotten a chance to get back here, so I think I will let someone else finish the review. Chris857 (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px This impressive article is a fivefold expansion of the version immediately before the expansion. It is new enough and does not lack for length! The English is perfectly satisfactory for DYK. The image is suitably licensed and either hook is referenced to a reliable source, but I prefer the original, no image, hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)