Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Swedish Levant Company"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (full review needed) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 6) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Swedish Levant Company==== | ====Swedish Levant Company==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Swedish Levant Company|Swedish Levant Company}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Swedish Levant Company|Swedish Levant Company}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' was controversial? <small>Source: [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:173390/FULLTEXT01.pdf "In many ways, establishing the Levant company was a controversial issue, a fact reflected in the ''riksdag'' of 1738."] </small> | * ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' was controversial? <small>Source: [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:173390/FULLTEXT01.pdf "In many ways, establishing the Levant company was a controversial issue, a fact reflected in the ''riksdag'' of 1738."] </small> | ||
− | :* '''ALT1:''' ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' in | + | :* '''ALT1:''' ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' in 1738 was controversial? <small>Source: [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:173390/FULLTEXT01.pdf "In many ways, establishing the Levant company was a controversial issue, a fact reflected in the ''riksdag'' of 1738."] </small> |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Sulayman ibn Sa'd al-Khushani]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Sulayman ibn Sa'd al-Khushani]] | ||
:* ''Comment'': This is my first time with [[WP:DYK]]. I created the article and submitted it to [[WP:AFC]]. | :* ''Comment'': This is my first time with [[WP:DYK]]. I created the article and submitted it to [[WP:AFC]]. | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] ([[User talk:Bkissin|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:MJL|MJL]] ([[User talk:MJL|talk]]) at 02:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] ([[User talk:Bkissin|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:MJL|MJL]] ([[User talk:MJL|talk]]) at 02:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I'll do a full review soon, but right now I have concerns about both hooks: they're not exactly eye-catching or hooky. Like, instead of saying that the creation of the company was controversial, it might be a good idea to include the context for that in the hook. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 02:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I'll do a full review soon, but right now I have concerns about both hooks: they're not exactly eye-catching or hooky. Like, instead of saying that the creation of the company was controversial, it might be a good idea to include the context for that in the hook. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 02:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
Line 26: | Line 18: | ||
:* <s>'''ALT2:''' ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' in [[1738]] was controversial because of a disagreement between the merchants and the [[Hats (party)|Hat Party]]?</s> --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 13:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC) | :* <s>'''ALT2:''' ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' in [[1738]] was controversial because of a disagreement between the merchants and the [[Hats (party)|Hat Party]]?</s> --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 13:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::{{re|valereee|Narutolovehinata5}} Oh my gosh I love that one!!! <small>Only correction would be to change {{tq|the merchants}} to {{tq|several Swedish merchants}} because according to the source the merchant elite supported the English model.</small> –<span style="font-family:CG Times">[[User:MJL|<span style="color:black">MJL</span>]] [[User talk:MJL|‐'''Talk'''‐]]<sup>[[WP:WikiProject Connecticut|☖]]</sup></span> 16:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC) | :::{{re|valereee|Narutolovehinata5}} Oh my gosh I love that one!!! <small>Only correction would be to change {{tq|the merchants}} to {{tq|several Swedish merchants}} because according to the source the merchant elite supported the English model.</small> –<span style="font-family:CG Times">[[User:MJL|<span style="color:black">MJL</span>]] [[User talk:MJL|‐'''Talk'''‐]]<sup>[[WP:WikiProject Connecticut|☖]]</sup></span> 16:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
− | :*'''ALT2a:''' ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' in | + | :*'''ALT2a:''' ... that the creation of the '''[[Swedish Levant Company]]''' in 1738 was controversial because of a disagreement between several Swedish merchants and the [[Hats (party)|Hat Party]]? --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 16:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC) |
:ALT2a is really good. I have however seen some typos in the article, for example "At major issue was" instead of "a major issue was". [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 00:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC) | :ALT2a is really good. I have however seen some typos in the article, for example "At major issue was" instead of "a major issue was". [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 00:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
::{{u|Narutolovehinata5}}, I've done a quick copyedit --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 17:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC) | ::{{u|Narutolovehinata5}}, I've done a quick copyedit --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 17:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed; prior reviewer has not returned after four weeks. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed; prior reviewer has not returned after four weeks. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
− | + | * {{DYK checklist | |
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | |newness = y |
+ | |length = y | ||
+ | |sourced = y | ||
+ | |neutral = y | ||
+ | |plagiarismfree = y | ||
+ | |hookcited = y | ||
+ | |hookinterest = y | ||
+ | |picfree = NA | ||
+ | |qpq = y | ||
+ | |status = y | ||
+ | |comments = The article is a great introduction; ALT2a is best. (I've unlinked the year; we don't link dates like that.) Some suggestions: | ||
+ | * Thorough citation is good, but review [[WP:CITEDENSE]]; quite a few of your footnotes would be fine merely being at the end of the paragraph. | ||
+ | * You have a tendency to [[WP:OVERLINK]]. For example, outside of discussion of economic theory it's usually not necessary to link something like "profit". | ||
+ | * Take care with what you cite. If you cite a chapter in an edited volume, for example, you should be citing the chapter title. (If it's a chapter from a [[monograph]] it's not necessary.) The editor of the volume is not an author of that chapter. | ||
+ | * External links to catalogs like Worldcat aren't that useful; mainly link if (partial) access to the text is available. | ||
+ | * Expand the lead; it should summarize what's in the article so it can be a bit longer. | ||
+ | I think this is ready for promotion. | ||
+ | |sign = [[user:Kim Post|Kim Post]] ([[user talk:Kim Post|talk]]) 17:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | }}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 06:35, 30 June 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Swedish Levant Company
- ... that the creation of the Swedish Levant Company was controversial? Source: "In many ways, establishing the Levant company was a controversial issue, a fact reflected in the riksdag of 1738."
- ALT1: ... that the creation of the Swedish Levant Company in 1738 was controversial? Source: "In many ways, establishing the Levant company was a controversial issue, a fact reflected in the riksdag of 1738."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sulayman ibn Sa'd al-Khushani
- Comment: This is my first time with WP:DYK. I created the article and submitted it to WP:AFC.
Moved to mainspace by Bkissin (talk). Nominated by MJL (talk) at 02:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC).
I'll do a full review soon, but right now I have concerns about both hooks: they're not exactly eye-catching or hooky. Like, instead of saying that the creation of the company was controversial, it might be a good idea to include the context for that in the hook. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- I also have to note that, while you have done a QPQ, as you have less than five DYK nominations, you are not required to do a QPQ (you can still do one of course if you want, it's just optional right now). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
ALT2: ... that the creation of the Swedish Levant Company in 1738 was controversial because of a disagreement between the merchants and the Hat Party?--valereee (talk) 13:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re Oh my gosh I love that one!!! Only correction would be to change Template:Tq to Template:Tq because according to the source the merchant elite supported the English model. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- ALT2a: ... that the creation of the Swedish Levant Company in 1738 was controversial because of a disagreement between several Swedish merchants and the Hat Party? --valereee (talk) 16:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- ALT2a is really good. I have however seen some typos in the article, for example "At major issue was" instead of "a major issue was". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:U, I've done a quick copyedit --valereee (talk) 17:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Full review needed; prior reviewer has not returned after four weeks. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.