Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Swiss referenda, 2012"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Esemono |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from March 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 18:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Swiss referenda, 2012==== | ====Swiss referenda, 2012==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Swiss referenda, 2012|Swiss referenda, 2012}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Swiss referenda, 2012|Swiss referenda, 2012}} | ||
| − | + | *... that voters in [[Zurich]], Switzerland '''[[Swiss referendums, 2012|approved]]''' the creation of "[[Prostitution in Switzerland|sex boxes]]"? | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2012 Stratfor email leak|2012 Stratfor email leak]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2012 Stratfor email leak|2012 Stratfor email leak]] | ||
:*''Comment'': '''ALT1''' ... that voters in [[Zurich]], Switzerland '''[[Swiss referendums, 2012|approved]]''' the creation of "[[Prostitution in Switzerland|sex boxes]]" to keep prostitution away from the suburbs?<br> | :*''Comment'': '''ALT1''' ... that voters in [[Zurich]], Switzerland '''[[Swiss referendums, 2012|approved]]''' the creation of "[[Prostitution in Switzerland|sex boxes]]" to keep prostitution away from the suburbs?<br> | ||
'''ALT2''' ... that there were 5 national and 2 sub-national issues in a single day in Switzerland for '''[[Swiss referenda, 2012|voter approval by referenda]]'''"? | '''ALT2''' ... that there were 5 national and 2 sub-national issues in a single day in Switzerland for '''[[Swiss referenda, 2012|voter approval by referenda]]'''"? | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Nightstallion|Nightstallion]] ([[User talk:Nightstallion|talk]]), [[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) at 04:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Nightstallion|Nightstallion]] ([[User talk:Nightstallion|talk]]), [[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) at 04:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Date, length and hook all OK. Good to go. I think the original hook is probably the best one, I've edited it slightly to remove the redirect. [[User:The C of E|The C of E. God Save The Queen!]] ([[User talk:The C of E|talk]]) 20:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Date, length and hook all OK. Good to go. I think the original hook is probably the best one, I've edited it slightly to remove the redirect. [[User:The C of E|The C of E. God Save The Queen!]] ([[User talk:The C of E|talk]]) 20:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Line 28: | Line 17: | ||
*The copyright issues seem to have been taken care of but without the listed content isn't this article too short? -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] ([[User talk:Esemono|talk]]) 04:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | *The copyright issues seem to have been taken care of but without the listed content isn't this article too short? -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] ([[User talk:Esemono|talk]]) 04:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
:*Indeed. Most of the article content is rendered as bullets. There's not enough prose left to qualify for DYK. If some of the bullets were converted to prose, it would qualify. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 03:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC) | :*Indeed. Most of the article content is rendered as bullets. There's not enough prose left to qualify for DYK. If some of the bullets were converted to prose, it would qualify. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 03:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::*{{DYK?again}} OK looks like article now has 1500+ characters --[[User:Esemono|Esemono]] ([[User talk:Esemono|talk]]) 23:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | + | ::*{{DYK?again}} OK looks like article now has 1500+ characters --[[User:Esemono|Esemono]] ([[User talk:Esemono|talk]]) 23:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:01, 7 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Swiss referenda, 2012
- Reviewed: 2012 Stratfor email leak
- Comment: ALT1 ... that voters in Zurich, Switzerland approved the creation of "sex boxes" to keep prostitution away from the suburbs?
ALT2 ... that there were 5 national and 2 sub-national issues in a single day in Switzerland for voter approval by referenda"? Created/expanded by Nightstallion (talk), Lihaas (talk). Nominated by Lihaas (talk) at 04:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- 16px Date, length and hook all OK. Good to go. I think the original hook is probably the best one, I've edited it slightly to remove the redirect. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 20:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm concerned that the structure and phrasing of this article is too close to that of its sources. For some quick examples, compare "would both cost billions of francs and could lead to the relocation of big business to countries like Germany" with "would costs billions and see companies relocate to countries like Germany", or "special parking spaces that have walls between them" with "special parking spaces with walls between them", or "The measure was brought by an environmental organisation on the grounds that a construction boom in mountain resorts have caused natural resources wastage and inflated property prices" with "The environmental organisation that brought the initiative argued the construction boom in mountain resorts had led to a waste of natural resources and massively boosted property prices". Nikkimaria (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- The copyright issues seem to have been taken care of but without the listed content isn't this article too short? -- Esemono (talk) 04:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
