Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Tayy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Al Ameer son |
imported>PFHLai (to P2) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 18:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Tayy==== | ====Tayy==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Tayy|Tayy}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Tayy|Tayy}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that by the 13th century, the '''[[Tayy]]''' were the dominant [[Arab]] tribe in the [[Syrian steppe]], [[Upper Mesopotamia]] and [[Najd|north-central Arabia]]? | * ... that by the 13th century, the '''[[Tayy]]''' were the dominant [[Arab]] tribe in the [[Syrian steppe]], [[Upper Mesopotamia]] and [[Najd|north-central Arabia]]? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Dlusskyidris|Dlusskyidris]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Dlusskyidris|Dlusskyidris]] | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer son]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer son]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] This article is a substantial enlargement of a pre-existing article. It is new enough but not quite long enough. Originally it was 5626B in length and it is currently 26KB, which is marginally too short. Could you confirm my impression that "Najd and the northern Hejaz", as mentioned in the article, can properly equate to "north-central Arabia". There is also need of a QPQ before this can proceed. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] This article is a substantial enlargement of a pre-existing article. It is new enough but not quite long enough. Originally it was 5626B in length and it is currently 26KB, which is marginally too short. Could you confirm my impression that "Najd and the northern Hejaz", as mentioned in the article, can properly equate to "north-central Arabia". There is also need of a QPQ before this can proceed. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
::*{{ping|Cwmhiraeth}} I expanded the article further, and added my QPQ review. I'll probably continue expanding the article in the coming days. --[[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]) 20:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ::*{{ping|Cwmhiraeth}} I expanded the article further, and added my QPQ review. I'll probably continue expanding the article in the coming days. --[[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]) 20:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
::*Also, yes "Najd and northern Hejaz" are supposed to mean north-central Arabia in the hook. I'll clarify in the article. --[[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]) 23:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ::*Also, yes "Najd and northern Hejaz" are supposed to mean north-central Arabia in the hook. I'll clarify in the article. --[[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]) 23:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] This article is now sufficiently expanded and a QPQ has been done. The hook fact has an inline citation to a reliable source. The article seems neutral and during inspection of some of the sources, I did not detect any copyright issues. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 18:53, 4 June 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 18:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Tayy
- ... that by the 13th century, the Tayy were the dominant Arab tribe in the Syrian steppe, Upper Mesopotamia and north-central Arabia?
- Reviewed: Dlusskyidris
5x expanded by Al Ameer son (talk). Self-nominated at 23:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC).
This article is a substantial enlargement of a pre-existing article. It is new enough but not quite long enough. Originally it was 5626B in length and it is currently 26KB, which is marginally too short. Could you confirm my impression that "Najd and the northern Hejaz", as mentioned in the article, can properly equate to "north-central Arabia". There is also need of a QPQ before this can proceed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I expanded the article further, and added my QPQ review. I'll probably continue expanding the article in the coming days. --Al Ameer (talk) 20:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Also, yes "Najd and northern Hejaz" are supposed to mean north-central Arabia in the hook. I'll clarify in the article. --Al Ameer (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
This article is now sufficiently expanded and a QPQ has been done. The hook fact has an inline citation to a reliable source. The article seems neutral and during inspection of some of the sources, I did not detect any copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)