Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Termitomyces eurhizus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Alekjds (great, good to go) |
imported>Narutolovehinata5 (promoting) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 11:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Termitomyces eurhizus==== | ====Termitomyces eurhizus==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Termitomyces eurhizus|Termitomyces eurhizus}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Termitomyces eurhizus|Termitomyces eurhizus}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the edible mushroom '''''[[Termitomyces eurhizus]]''''' grows out of termite mounds? <small>See [http://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/pdf/download/eid/1-s2.0-S0007153675800933/first-page-pdf here] and [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4118066 here]</small> | * ... that the edible mushroom '''''[[Termitomyces eurhizus]]''''' grows out of termite mounds? <small>See [http://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/pdf/download/eid/1-s2.0-S0007153675800933/first-page-pdf here] and [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4118066 here]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that the edible fungus '''''[[Termitomyces eurhizus]]''''' has a symbiotic relationship with termites? <small>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15000230 source]</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that the edible fungus '''''[[Termitomyces eurhizus]]''''' has a symbiotic relationship with termites? <small>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15000230 source]</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/St. Michaelis, Lüneburg]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/St. Michaelis, Lüneburg]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough (created on 19 November), long enough (with 1937 characters of readable prose). The article is well cited in inline citations throughout. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Termitomyces+eurhizus&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig] utterly rules out plagiarism. QPQ done. I like both hooks (I would vote for the second), which are both supported by the sources provided above, but {{ping|Casliber}} can't those facts be explicitly cited with inline citations ''within'' the article itself? Currently they are not. (They're practically the only facts not explicitly cited in the article.) Once that's done I'll be happy to approve. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 11:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough (created on 19 November), long enough (with 1937 characters of readable prose). The article is well cited in inline citations throughout. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Termitomyces+eurhizus&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig] utterly rules out plagiarism. QPQ done. I like both hooks (I would vote for the second), which are both supported by the sources provided above, but {{ping|Casliber}} can't those facts be explicitly cited with inline citations ''within'' the article itself? Currently they are not. (They're practically the only facts not explicitly cited in the article.) Once that's done I'll be happy to approve. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 11:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
::*Cites added. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 11:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ::*Cites added. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 11:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Well done, thanks. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 13:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | + | :::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Well done, thanks. — '''[[User:Alekjds|AJDS]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Alekjds|talk]]</sup> 13:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 9 December 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Termitomyces eurhizus
- ... that the edible mushroom Termitomyces eurhizus grows out of termite mounds? See here and here
- ALT1:... that the edible fungus Termitomyces eurhizus has a symbiotic relationship with termites? source
Created by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 00:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC).
New enough (created on 19 November), long enough (with 1937 characters of readable prose). The article is well cited in inline citations throughout. Earwig utterly rules out plagiarism. QPQ done. I like both hooks (I would vote for the second), which are both supported by the sources provided above, but Template:Ping can't those facts be explicitly cited with inline citations within the article itself? Currently they are not. (They're practically the only facts not explicitly cited in the article.) Once that's done I'll be happy to approve. — AJDS talk 11:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
