Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Castle Doctrine"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (Add space after ellipsis)
imported>TParis
(ALT1 promoted to Prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from February 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=February 2014
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 07:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)<br />}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====The Castle Doctrine====
 
====The Castle Doctrine====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Castle Doctrine|The Castle Doctrine}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Castle Doctrine|The Castle Doctrine}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the 2014 [[strategy video game]] '''''[[The Castle Doctrine]]''''' was created in part as an "artistic statement" on [[Right to keep and bear arms|gun rights]]?
 
* ... that the 2014 [[strategy video game]] '''''[[The Castle Doctrine]]''''' was created in part as an "artistic statement" on [[Right to keep and bear arms|gun rights]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Back to the Future (musical)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Back to the Future (musical)]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Tezero|Tezero]] ([[User talk:Tezero|talk]]), [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) at 12:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Tezero|Tezero]] ([[User talk:Tezero|talk]]), [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) at 12:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)</small>.
Line 19: Line 12:
 
**The original hook is a bit weak, "partially as an artistic statement" doesn't seem to say much, and gun rights aren't the primary concern of the game (as opposed to something like [[Molleindustria]]'s ''[http://www.molleindustria.org/the-best-amendment/ The Best Amendment]''.  The alt hook makes a stronger statement.  The statement is sourced to Pitt's [https://twitter.com/russpitts/statuses/429386991365394432 twitter] rather than his [http://www.polygon.com/2014/1/31/5365340/the-castle-doctrine-review review] at Polygon, but should count as a reliable self published source. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 
**The original hook is a bit weak, "partially as an artistic statement" doesn't seem to say much, and gun rights aren't the primary concern of the game (as opposed to something like [[Molleindustria]]'s ''[http://www.molleindustria.org/the-best-amendment/ The Best Amendment]''.  The alt hook makes a stronger statement.  The statement is sourced to Pitt's [https://twitter.com/russpitts/statuses/429386991365394432 twitter] rather than his [http://www.polygon.com/2014/1/31/5365340/the-castle-doctrine-review review] at Polygon, but should count as a reliable self published source. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 
***I'm happy with that alt, struggled to find one I liked originally. [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 
***I'm happy with that alt, struggled to find one I liked originally. [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|The Castle Doctrine|Tezero}}
 
* {{DYKmake|The Castle Doctrine|Samwalton9}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New (Feb. 4), long enough, within policy, no copyvio in spotcheck, [[Wikipedia:QPQ|QPQ]] done. First hook doesn't have immediate refs in article (see [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria|3b]]). Please ping me if I don't respond. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font>&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 04:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New (Feb. 4), long enough, within policy, no copyvio in spotcheck, [[Wikipedia:QPQ|QPQ]] done. First hook doesn't have immediate refs in article (see [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria|3b]]). Please ping me if I don't respond. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font>&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 04:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 17:
 
::::By "first hook", I mean the main one—sorry, could have been clearer. 3b says that each item referenced in the hook should have a footnote after its sentence in the article, so you'd just have to distribute the references to the individual sentences. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font>&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 14:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 
::::By "first hook", I mean the main one—sorry, could have been clearer. 3b says that each item referenced in the hook should have a footnote after its sentence in the article, so you'd just have to distribute the references to the individual sentences. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font>&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 14:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 
:::::No worries, I've cited that statement directly; the source was just at the end of the paragraph. [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) 14:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 
:::::No worries, I've cited that statement directly; the source was just at the end of the paragraph. [[User:Samwalton9|Samwalton9]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) 14:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
::::::I added the refs myself just because it was easy enough. You can see in the history. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] either hook, gtg <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font>&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 17:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
+
::::::I added the refs myself just because it was easy enough. You can see in the history. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] either hook, gtg <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font>&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 17:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 07:57, 17 February 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by v/r - TP 07:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The Castle Doctrine

Created by Tezero (talk), Samwalton9 (talk). Nominated by Samwalton9 (talk) at 12:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC).

  • ALT1 ... that Russ Pitts, an editor at Polygon, described The Castle Doctrine as the most disturbing video game he'd ever played?
    • The original hook is a bit weak, "partially as an artistic statement" doesn't seem to say much, and gun rights aren't the primary concern of the game (as opposed to something like Molleindustria's The Best Amendment. The alt hook makes a stronger statement. The statement is sourced to Pitt's twitter rather than his review at Polygon, but should count as a reliable self published source. - hahnchen 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      • I'm happy with that alt, struggled to find one I liked originally. Samwalton9 (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg New (Feb. 4), long enough, within policy, no copyvio in spotcheck, QPQ done. First hook doesn't have immediate refs in article (see 3b). Please ping me if I don't respond. czar  04:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The original hook or alt? Samwalton9 (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
By "first hook", I mean the main one—sorry, could have been clearer. 3b says that each item referenced in the hook should have a footnote after its sentence in the article, so you'd just have to distribute the references to the individual sentences. czar  14:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
No worries, I've cited that statement directly; the source was just at the end of the paragraph. Samwalton9 (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
I added the refs myself just because it was easy enough. You can see in the history. Symbol confirmed.svg either hook, gtg czar  17:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)