Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Diary of Malcolm X"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gobonobo (review) |
imported>Maile66 (promoted to Prep area 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from December 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 23:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====The Diary of Malcolm X==== | ====The Diary of Malcolm X==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Diary of Malcolm X|The Diary of Malcolm X}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Diary of Malcolm X|The Diary of Malcolm X}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that publication of '''''[[The Diary of Malcolm X]]''''' is being held up by a legal dispute between the publisher and some of Malcolm X's daughters? | * ... that publication of '''''[[The Diary of Malcolm X]]''''' is being held up by a legal dispute between the publisher and some of Malcolm X's daughters? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*Reviewed: [[Space selfie]] | :*Reviewed: [[Space selfie]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]]). Self nominated at 00:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]]). Self nominated at 00:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New and long enough. The article addresses the topic in a neutral fashion that complies with BLP. QPQ has been done. Hook is interesting, accurate, and cited. The article's image has a valid fair-use rationale. No plagiarism or close paraphrasing was detected. This looks good to go. [[User:Gobonobo|<font face="DejaVu Sans" color="333300">Gobōnobō</font>]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|<sup>+</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|<sup>c</sup>]] 18:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 23:25, 31 December 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Diary of Malcolm X
- ... that publication of The Diary of Malcolm X is being held up by a legal dispute between the publisher and some of Malcolm X's daughters?
- Reviewed: Space selfie
Created by Malik Shabazz (talk). Self nominated at 00:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC).
New and long enough. The article addresses the topic in a neutral fashion that complies with BLP. QPQ has been done. Hook is interesting, accurate, and cited. The article's image has a valid fair-use rationale. No plagiarism or close paraphrasing was detected. This looks good to go. Gobōnobō + c 18:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
