Difference between revisions of "Template:FPC urgents"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Makeemlighter
(Undid revision 501139231 by 86.139.213.143 (talk))
imported>Adam Cuerden
(-1 passing)
 
(169 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
! style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-size:111%; padding:5px; margin-bottom:0px; border-bottom:2px #5800a8 solid" colspan="2" | [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|FPCs]] needing feedback <br />{{view|edit|template=FPC_urgents}}
 
! style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-size:111%; padding:5px; margin-bottom:0px; border-bottom:2px #5800a8 solid" colspan="2" | [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|FPCs]] needing feedback <br />{{view|edit|template=FPC_urgents}}
 
<!--{{FPC urgents/Row|NomName|File:Foo.jpg|LinkName}}-->
 
<!--{{FPC urgents/Row|NomName|File:Foo.jpg|LinkName}}-->
 +
{{FPC urgents/Row|delist/Ilya Repin - Sadko|File:Sadko.jpg|''Delist and Replace:'' Sadko}}
 +
||{{FPC urgents/Row|delist/American_Gothic|File:Grant_DeVolson_Wood_-_American_Gothic.jpg|''Delist and Replace:'' American Gothic}}
 +
{{FPC urgents/Row|Fan and Mortar Geysers|File:Fan and Mortar Geyser Eruption.jpg}}
 +
||{{FPC urgents/Row|Torcal de Antequera|File:Rocks El Torcal de Antequera karst Andalusia Spain.jpg}}
 +
{{FPC urgents/Row|Map of the Battle of Jutland, 1916|File:Map_of_the_Battle_of_Jutland,_1916.svg}}
 
<!-- Add nominations above this line, using the FPC urgents/Row template. -->
 
<!-- Add nominations above this line, using the FPC urgents/Row template. -->
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 20:22, 11 January 2013

FPCs needing feedback


Sadko.jpg Delist and Replace: Sadko
Grant DeVolson Wood - American Gothic.jpg Delist and Replace: American Gothic


Fan and Mortar Geyser Eruption.jpg Fan and Mortar Geysers
Rocks El Torcal de Antequera karst Andalusia Spain.jpg Torcal de Antequera


Map of the Battle of Jutland, 1916.svg Map of the Battle of Jutland, 1916

The FPC urgents template is used at the top of the featured picture candidates list to let reviewers know which nominations most urgently need reviews. If a nomination is at least 6 days old and is neither obviously going to pass (i.e. consensus + more than 5 supports) nor obviously going to fail (i.e. at least 2 oppose votes and no supports), it may be listed here.