Difference between revisions of "Template:GAQFList/sandbox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Gazz84 (←Created page with '<!-- Add your experimental template code here --><noinclude> {{template sandbox notice}} </noinclude> {{subst:FGAN |reliable sources = Fail |neutral = Fail |cle...') |
imported>Joe Gazz84 |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{template sandbox notice}} | {{template sandbox notice}} | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
| − | === | + | ===Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment=== |
| − | This article | + | This article was assessed against the [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]. This is how the article, as of March 13, 2011, compares against the [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]: |
| − | :'''1. | + | :'''1. No obvious non-reliable sources?:''' Fail |
| − | :'''2. | + | :'''2. Is it neutral?:''' Pass |
| − | :'''3. | + | :'''3. No outstanding cleanup tags?:''' |
| − | :'''4. | + | :'''4. Article is not subject of recent/current edit war?:''' Pass |
| − | :'''5. | + | :'''5. Changing in article is not rapid?''' Fail |
| − | :''' | + | :'''Reason for Closure Decision:''' 1,3,5 Failed |
| − | + | These items all need to say '''Pass''' by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here: {{notdone|Failed}} | |
| − | + | — <span style="border:1px solid;background:#FFFFFF">[[User:Joe_Gazz84|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> JoeGazz </span>''']][[User talk:Joe_Gazz84|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:red;"> ▲ </span>]]</span> 23:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 23:32, 13 March 2011
| File:Sandbox.svg | This is the template sandbox page for Template:GAQFList (diff). |
Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment
This article was assessed against the quick fail criteria. This is how the article, as of March 13, 2011, compares against the quick fail criteria:
- 1. No obvious non-reliable sources?: Fail
- 2. Is it neutral?: Pass
- 3. No outstanding cleanup tags?:
- 4. Article is not subject of recent/current edit war?: Pass
- 5. Changing in article is not rapid? Fail
- Reason for Closure Decision: 1,3,5 Failed
These items all need to say Pass by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here: Template:Notdone — JoeGazz ▲ 23:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)