Difference between revisions of "Template:GAchecklist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Steven Walling m (→Good Article nomination: grammar) |
imported>Retro (Moving documentation to documentation subpage.) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Good Article nomination== | ==Good Article nomination== | ||
| − | <div style="padding: | + | <div style="padding:5px; border: 3px solid #50C878;"> |
| − | :''This article was nominated for [[WP: | + | :''This article was nominated for [[WP:good article|good article]] status. The review began on {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTDAY}}, {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}}. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|six good article criteria]].'' |
<!-- ANY INTRODUCTORY REMARKS GO HERE. | <!-- ANY INTRODUCTORY REMARKS GO HERE. | ||
FEEL FREE TO REMOVE NON-NUMBERED HEADINGS IN THE SECTIONS BELOW, | FEEL FREE TO REMOVE NON-NUMBERED HEADINGS IN THE SECTIONS BELOW, | ||
IF YOU PREFER A MORE FREE-FORM STYLE; KEEP THE SIX NUMBERED HEADINGS, THOUGH. | IF YOU PREFER A MORE FREE-FORM STYLE; KEEP THE SIX NUMBERED HEADINGS, THOUGH. | ||
| − | ANY EXTENSIVE DISCUSSION SHOULD BE PUT IN A SEPARATE SECTION, BELOW THE | + | ANY EXTENSIVE DISCUSSION SHOULD BE PUT IN A SEPARATE SECTION, BELOW THE GREEN BOX. --> |
'''1. Well written?:''' | '''1. Well written?:''' | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<!-- PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LEAD SECTION, WHICH IS FREQUENTLY PROBLEMATIC --> | <!-- PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LEAD SECTION, WHICH IS FREQUENTLY PROBLEMATIC --> | ||
| − | '''2. Factually accurate and [[WP: | + | '''2. Factually accurate and [[WP:Verifiability|verifiable]]?:''' |
| − | :References | + | :References layout: |
| − | :Citations to reliable sources | + | :Citations to [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]]: |
| − | :[[WP: | + | :[[WP:No original research|No original research]]: |
'''3. Broad in coverage?:''' | '''3. Broad in coverage?:''' | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:Focused: | :Focused: | ||
| − | '''4. Reflects a [[WP: | + | '''4. Reflects a [[WP:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]?:''' |
:Fair representation without bias: | :Fair representation without bias: | ||
| − | '''5. | + | '''5. Stable?''' |
| − | :No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): | + | :No edit wars, content disputes, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): |
| − | '''6. Illustrated by [[WP: | + | '''6. Illustrated by [[WP:Images|images]], when possible and appropriate?:''' {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if: {{{images|}}}|{{{images}}}| Pass }} |
:Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]: | :Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]: | ||
| − | :Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP: | + | :Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]: |
'''Overall''': | '''Overall''': | ||
| − | :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|}} | + | :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|}} <!-- ADD "yes" OR "no" TO THIS TEMPLATE WHEN THE REVIEW IS COMPLETE, AFTER "check|" (e.g., {{GAList/check|yes}}) --> |
| − | <!-- | ||
| + | <!-- OVERALL COMMENTS. AT MINIMUM, ACKNOWLEDGE THE WORK OF THE CONTRIBUTING WRITERS AND EDITORS. | ||
| + | COMMENTS MAY BE MADE DURING REVIEW, AND/OR UPON COMPLETION. | ||
| + | ALSO SUGGEST THAT NOMINATOR PERFORM A GA REVIEW. --> | ||
| − | + | :''If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a [[WP:Good article reassessment|reassessment]]. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|renominate]] it.'' | |
| − | + | </div><noinclude>{{documentation}}</noinclude> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | :''If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a [[WP: | ||
| − | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:09, 19 May 2019
Good Article nomination
- This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on January 22, 2026. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References layout:
- Citations to reliable sources:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Stable?
- No edit wars, content disputes, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail:

- If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:GAchecklist/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |