Difference between revisions of "Template:Infobox court case/testcases"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Arctic.gnome
(test)
imported>GiantSnowman
m (disambig)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template test cases notice}}
 
{{Template test cases notice}}
{{Wikipedia:Featured list tools|Template:Infobox Court Case/testcases}}
 
  
{{infobox court case/sandbox|
+
{{Testcase table
|name=Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General)
+
| name              = Tennessee v. Scopes
|court=[[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]]
+
| image              =
|image=
+
| court             = Criminal Court of Tennessee
|date decided= October 18, 1929
+
| full name         = The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
|full name=Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General)
+
| date decided      = July 21, 1925
|citations=[1930] A.C. 124, [http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html 1929 UKPC 86].
+
| citations          = None
|number of judges=5
+
| judges            = [[John T. Raulston]]
|judges=Lord [[John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey|Sankey]], L.C., Lord [[Charles Darling, 1st Baron Darling|Darling]], Lord [[Henry Duke, 1st Baron Merrivale|Merrivale]], Lord [[Thomas Tomlin, Baron Tomlin|Tomlin]], and Sir [[Lancelot Sanderson]]
+
| prior actions      =
|decision by=Viscount Sankey
+
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]''
|keywords=test 1
+
| opinions          =
|opinions=test 2
+
|italic title = no
 +
| ECLI = ECLI:NL:blabla}}
 +
 
 +
{{Infobox_court_case/sandbox| name              = Tennessee v. Scopes
 +
| image             =
 +
| court              = Criminal Court of Tennessee
 +
| full name         = The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
 +
| date decided      = July 21, 1925
 +
| citations         = None
 +
| judges            = [[John T. Raulston]]
 +
| prior actions      =
 +
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]''
 +
| opinions          =
 +
|italic title = no
 +
| ECLI = ECLI:NL:blabla}}
 +
 
 +
{{Testcase table |
 +
name=Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick |
 +
court=[[High Court of Australia]] |
 +
image=Coat of Arms of Australia.svg |
 +
date decided=10 December 2002 |
 +
full name= Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick, Joseph |
 +
citations= {{Cite AustLII|HCA|56|2002}}, 210 CLR 575, 194 ALR 433, 77 ALJR 255|
 +
judges=[[Murray Gleeson|Gleeson]] CJ, [[Mary Gaudron|Gaudron]], [[Michael McHugh (judge)|McHugh]], [[William Gummow|Gummow]], [[Michael Kirby (judge)|Kirby]], [[Kenneth Hayne|Hayne]] & [[Ian Callinan|Callinan]] JJ |
 +
prior actions=Appeal from [[Supreme Court of Victoria]]|
 +
subsequent actions=none |
 +
opinions=
 +
'''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from.  This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small>
 +
'''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>
 +
| ECLI = ECLI:EU:blabla}}}}
 +
 
 +
{{Testcase table
 +
|name              = Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation (Tools)
 +
|court              = [[Court of Appeal of England and Wales]]
 +
|image              =
 +
|imagesize          =
 +
|imagelink          =
 +
|imagealt          =
 +
|caption            =
 +
|full name          = 
 +
|date decided      = {{Start date|1947|11|10}}
 +
|citations          = {{Cite BAILII|court=EWCA|division=Civ|year=1947|num=1}}
 +
|transcripts        =
 +
|judges            = [[Lord Greene]], Somervell LJ, Singleton J
 +
|number of judges  =
 +
|decision by       =
 +
|prior actions      =
 +
|appealed from      =
 +
|appealed to        =
 +
|subsequent actions =
 +
|related actions    =
 +
|opinions          =  
 +
|keywords           = {{flatlist|*[[Judicial review]]}}
 +
|italic title      =
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
{{Testcase table
 +
|name              = Foo vs Bar
 +
|court              = Foo Court
 +
|image              = Example.jpg
 +
|imagesize          = 150px
 +
|imagelink          = Foo court
 +
|imagealt          = The court of all Foo justice
 +
|caption            = The court of all Foo justice
 +
|full name          = Mr Foo Man vs Bar, Inc.
 +
|date decided      = {{Start date|1916|05|10|df=}}
 +
|citations          = 000 0101 01110
 +
|transcripts        = Transcript of the case
 +
|judges            = Justice Lawman
 +
|number of judges  = 50
 +
|decision by        = Lawman
 +
|concurring        = Sternfrogg
 +
|dissenting        = Lenent
 +
|concur/dissent    = In. Decisiveness
 +
|prior actions      = None
 +
|appealed from      = Foo vs Bar 1887
 +
|appealed to        = Foo vs Bar 1932
 +
|subsequent actions = Settled out of court
 +
|related actions    = None
 +
|opinions          = Mr Foo Man was fined by the Foo court for having a silly name.
 +
|keywords          = {{Flatlist|sandbox, testcase}}
 +
|italic title      =
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
{{Infobox court case/sandbox
 +
  |Litigants= Abcd
 +
  |Litigants2= Abcd
 +
  |Litigants3= Abcd
 +
  |Litigants4= Abcd
 +
  |Litigants5= Abcd
 +
  |Court= Abcd
 +
  |CourtSeal= Example.jpg
 +
  |ArgueDate= 1 January
 +
  |ArgueDateA= 1 February
 +
  |ArgueDateB= 1 March
 +
  |ArgueYear= 1970
 +
  |ReargueDate= 1 January
 +
  |ReargueDate2= 1 February
 +
  |ReargueDateA= 1 March
 +
  |ReargueDateB= 1 April
 +
  |ReargueDateA2= 1 May
 +
  |ReargueDateB2= 1 June
 +
  |ReargueYear= 1971
 +
  |ReargueYear2= 1972
 +
  |SubmitDate= 1 July
 +
  |SubmitYear= 1973
 +
  |DecideDate= 2 July
 +
  |DecideYear= 1973
 +
  |FullName= Abcd
 +
  |Docket= Abcd
 +
  |Citations= Abcd
 +
  |Claim= Abcd
 +
  |Prior= Abcd
 +
  |Procedural= Abcd
 +
  |Subsequent= Abcd
 +
  |Holding= Abcd
 +
  |Judges= Abcd
 +
  |PerCuriam=yes
 +
  |Majority= Abcd
 +
  |JoinMajority= Abcd
 +
  |Majority2= Abcd
 +
  |JoinMajority2= Abcd
 +
  |Majority3= Abcd
 +
  |JoinMajority3= Abcd
 +
  |Plurality= Abcd
 +
  |JoinPlurality= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence2= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence2= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence3= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence3= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence4= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence4= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence5= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence5= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent2= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent2= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent3= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent3= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent4= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent4= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent5= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent5= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent6= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent6= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent7= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent7= Abcd
 +
  |Concurrence/Dissent8= Abcd
 +
  |JoinConcurrence/Dissent8= Abcd
 +
  |Dissent= Abcd
 +
  |JoinDissent= Abcd
 +
  |ConcurrenceDissent= Abcd
 +
  |Dissent2= Abcd
 +
  |JoinDissent2= Abcd
 +
  |ConcurrenceDissent2= Abcd
 +
  |Dissent3= Abcd
 +
  |JoinDissent3= Abcd
 +
  |ConcurrenceDissent3= Abcd
 +
  |Dissent4= Abcd
 +
  |JoinDissent4= Abcd
 +
  |ConcurrenceDissent4= Abcd
 +
  |Dissent5= Abcd
 +
  |JoinDissent5= Abcd
 +
  |ConcurrenceDissent5= Abcd
 +
  |Seriatim= Abcd
 +
  |Seriatim2= Abcd
 +
  |Seriatim3= Abcd
 +
  |Seriatim4= Abcd
 +
  |Seriatim5= Abcd
 +
  |NotParticipating= Abcd
 +
  |LawsApplied= Abcd
 +
  |Superseded= Abcd
 +
  |Overruled= Abcd
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
{{Testcase table
 +
|name              = name
 +
|court              = court
 +
|image              = Example.jpg
 +
|imagesize          = 123px
 +
|imagelink          = imagelink
 +
|imagealt          = imagealt
 +
|caption            = caption
 +
|full name          = full name
 +
|date decided      = date decided
 +
|citations          = citations
 +
|transcripts        = transcripts
 +
|judges            = judges
 +
|number of judges  = number of judges
 +
|decision by        = decision by
 +
|concurring        = concurring
 +
|dissenting        = dissenting
 +
|concur/dissent    = concur/dissent
 +
|prior actions      = prior actions
 +
|appealed from      = appealed from
 +
|appealed to        = appealed to
 +
|subsequent actions = subsequent actions
 +
|related actions    = related actions
 +
|opinions           = opinions
 +
|keywords          = keywords
 +
|italic title      = italic title
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:43, 10 April 2018

  1. REDIRECT Template:Testcases notice
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.

Template:Testcase table

Script error: No such module "If empty".
Script error: No such module "If empty".
CourtCriminal Court of Tennessee
Full case nameThe State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
DecidedJuly 21, 1925
Citation(s)None
ECLIECLI:NL:blabla
Case history
Subsequent action(s)Scopes v. State (1926)
Script error: No such module "If empty".
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingJohn T. Raulston

Template:Testcase table}}

Template:Testcase table

Template:Testcase table

Script error: No such module "If empty".
Script error: No such module "If empty".
CourtAbcd
Full case nameAbcd
Argued1 January, 1 March 19701 February – 1 March 1970
Reargued1 January 19711 March–1 April 19711 February 19721 May–1 June 1972
Submitted1 July 1973
Decided2 July 1973
Citation(s)Abcd
ClaimAbcd
Case history
Prior historyAbcd
Subsequent historyAbcd
Procedural historyAbcd
Holding
Script error: No such module "If empty".
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingAbcd
Case opinions
Per curiam
MajorityAbcd, joined by Abcd
MajorityAbcd, joined by Abcd
MajorityAbcd, joined by Abcd
PluralityAbcd, joined by Abcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Abcd took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Abcd
Superseded by
Abcd
Overruled by
Abcd

Template:Testcase table