Difference between revisions of "Template:Infobox court case/testcases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Underlying lk |
imported>GiantSnowman m (disambig) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]'' | | subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]'' | ||
| opinions = | | opinions = | ||
| − | |italic title = no}} | + | |italic title = no |
| + | | ECLI = ECLI:NL:blabla}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Infobox_court_case/sandbox| name = Tennessee v. Scopes | ||
| + | | image = | ||
| + | | court = Criminal Court of Tennessee | ||
| + | | full name = The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes | ||
| + | | date decided = July 21, 1925 | ||
| + | | citations = None | ||
| + | | judges = [[John T. Raulston]] | ||
| + | | prior actions = | ||
| + | | subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]'' | ||
| + | | opinions = | ||
| + | |italic title = no | ||
| + | | ECLI = ECLI:NL:blabla}} | ||
{{Testcase table | | {{Testcase table | | ||
name=Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick | | name=Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick | | ||
court=[[High Court of Australia]] | | court=[[High Court of Australia]] | | ||
| + | image=Coat of Arms of Australia.svg | | ||
date decided=10 December 2002 | | date decided=10 December 2002 | | ||
full name= Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick, Joseph | | full name= Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick, Joseph | | ||
citations= {{Cite AustLII|HCA|56|2002}}, 210 CLR 575, 194 ALR 433, 77 ALJR 255| | citations= {{Cite AustLII|HCA|56|2002}}, 210 CLR 575, 194 ALR 433, 77 ALJR 255| | ||
| − | judges=[[Murray Gleeson|Gleeson]] CJ, [[Mary Gaudron|Gaudron]], [[Michael McHugh|McHugh]], [[William Gummow|Gummow]], [[Michael Kirby (judge)|Kirby]], [[Kenneth Hayne|Hayne]] & [[Ian Callinan|Callinan]] JJ | | + | judges=[[Murray Gleeson|Gleeson]] CJ, [[Mary Gaudron|Gaudron]], [[Michael McHugh (judge)|McHugh]], [[William Gummow|Gummow]], [[Michael Kirby (judge)|Kirby]], [[Kenneth Hayne|Hayne]] & [[Ian Callinan|Callinan]] JJ | |
prior actions=Appeal from [[Supreme Court of Victoria]]| | prior actions=Appeal from [[Supreme Court of Victoria]]| | ||
subsequent actions=none | | subsequent actions=none | | ||
opinions= | opinions= | ||
'''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from. This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small> | '''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from. This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small> | ||
| − | '''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>}} | + | '''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small> |
| + | | ECLI = ECLI:EU:blabla}}}} | ||
{{Testcase table | {{Testcase table | ||
| Line 177: | Line 193: | ||
|name = name | |name = name | ||
|court = court | |court = court | ||
| − | |image = | + | |image = Example.jpg |
|imagesize = 123px | |imagesize = 123px | ||
|imagelink = imagelink | |imagelink = imagelink | ||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 10 April 2018
- REDIRECT Template:Testcases notice
- From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
|---|---|
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
| Court | Criminal Court of Tennessee |
| Full case name | The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes |
| Decided | July 21, 1925 |
| Citation(s) | None |
| ECLI | ECLI:NL:blabla |
| Case history | |
| Subsequent action(s) | Scopes v. State (1926) |
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | John T. Raulston |
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
|---|---|
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
| Court | Abcd |
| Full case name | Abcd |
| Argued | 1 January, 1 March 19701 February – 1 March 1970 |
| Reargued | 1 January 19711 March–1 April 19711 February 19721 May–1 June 1972 |
| Submitted | 1 July 1973 |
| Decided | 2 July 1973 |
| Citation(s) | Abcd |
| Claim | Abcd |
| Case history | |
| Prior history | Abcd |
| Subsequent history | Abcd |
| Procedural history | Abcd |
| Holding | |
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Abcd |
| Case opinions | |
| Per curiam | |
| Majority | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Majority | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Majority | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Plurality | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Abcd took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| Abcd | |
Superseded by | |
| Abcd | |
Overruled by | |
| Abcd | |