Difference between revisions of "Template:911ct"
blackwiki>Aude (rv) |
blackwiki>Lovelight (We have no other sources that explain descend of building 7, if you won't to name it conspiracy theory template expand it… CT stands for "Collapse Theory".) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
| − | == | + | ==Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center== |
The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease. | The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{tfd|911ct}} | {{tfd|911ct}} | ||
{| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;" | {| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;" | ||
| − | | align="center" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" colspan="2"|<div class="plainlinks" style="width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: smaller; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 0"><nowiki>[</nowiki>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:911ct&action=edit edit]<nowiki>]</nowiki></div>'''[[ | + | | align="center" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" colspan="2"|<div class="plainlinks" style="width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: smaller; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 0"><nowiki>[</nowiki>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:911ct&action=edit edit]<nowiki>]</nowiki></div>'''[[Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center]]<br>Controlled demolition hypotheses, proponents & supporters, and popular culture''' |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | align="center" halign="top" | | + | | align="center" halign="top" | Controlled demolition theories and hypotheses |
|- | |- | ||
| valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | [[Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center]] | | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | [[Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center]] | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 25 January 2007
Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.
When adding articles to the template please do so in alphabetical order. When adding an article to the template do not forget to add the template to the article. Simply add {{911ct}} directly above the categories the article is part of.
[edit] Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade CenterControlled demolition hypotheses, proponents & supporters, and popular culture | |
| Controlled demolition theories and hypotheses | |
| Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center | |
| Proponents and supporters of such theories and hypotheses | |
| David Ray Griffin | Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed | Kevin Barrett | Robert M. Bowman | Andreas von Bülow | James Fetzer | Sander Hicks | Jim Hoffman | Alex Jones | Steven E. Jones | Michael Ruppert | Peter Dale Scott | Webster G. Tarpley | Barrie Zwicker | |
| Groups supporting such theories and hypotheses | |
| 9/11 Citizens Watch | Family Steering Committee | Jersey Girls | Scholars for 9/11 Truth | |
| Movies regarding theories and hypotheses | |
| Loose Change | 911: In Plane Site | |
| Books regarding theories and hypotheses | |
| 9/11: The Big Lie | The CIA and September | The New Pearl Harbor | The Terror Timeline | The War on Freedom | |
This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist.