Difference between revisions of "Template:AMD Radeon Rx 200"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(mdy format like other entries)
blackwiki>Wikiinger
(Streamlined Core, Memory columns, nicer Boost values, removed API columns)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
−
! rowspan=2 | Core config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
+
! colspan=2 | Core
−
! colspan=2 | Clock rate
+
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="texture fill"}}{{efn|name="pixel fill"}}
−
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="pixel fillrate"}}{{efn|name="texture fillrate"}}
+
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
−
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
+
! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]])
−
! rowspan=2 | TDP ([[Watt|Watts]])
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
−
! colspan=3 | [[Application programming interface|API]] support (version)
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
|-
 
|-
−
! Core ([[Hertz|MHz]])<br />(Boost)
+
! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
−
! Memory ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
+
! Clock{{efn|name="boost"}} ([[Hertz|MHz]])
−
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)
−
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)
 +
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]
 +
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]
 +
! Bus&nbsp;type&nbsp;&<br />width ([[bit]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
−
! Bus width ([[bit]])
+
! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
−
! Bus type
+
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
−
! Bandwidth ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
 
−
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]<br />(Boost)
 
−
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]<br />(Boost)
 
−
! [[Direct3D]]
 
−
! [[OpenGL]]<br />[[OpenCL]]
 
−
! [[Vulkan (API)|Vulkan]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 210<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Cedar)
 
! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 210<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Cedar)
Line 34: Line 29:
 
| {{val|292|e=6}}<br />59 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| {{val|292|e=6}}<br />59 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 80:8:4
 
| 80:8:4
−
| 400<br />(?)
+
| 400
−
| 900
 
 
| 1.6
 
| 1.6
 
| 3.2
 
| 3.2
 +
| 64
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 256
 
| 256
−
| 64
+
| 900
−
| DDR3
 
 
| 7.2
 
| 7.2
−
| 64
 
−
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 19
 
| 19
 
| rowspan=5 | PCIe 2.1 ×16
 
| rowspan=5 | PCIe 2.1 ×16
−
| rowspan="5" | 11.0
 
−
| rowspan="5" | 4.4<br />1.2
 
−
| rowspan=5 {{N/A}}
 
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
 
|-
 
|-
Line 55: Line 46:
 
| rowspan=4 | {{val|370|e=6}}<br />67 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=4 | {{val|370|e=6}}<br />67 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 80:8:4
 
| 80:8:4
−
| 625<br />(650)
+
| 625<br />''650''
−
| 1066
 
 
| 2.5
 
| 2.5
 
| 5
 
| 5
 +
| 200
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
−
| 64
+
| 1066
−
| DDR3
 
 
| 8.53
 
| 8.53
−
| 200
 
−
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 18
 
| 18
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
Line 71: Line 61:
 
| {{dts|2014|04|03|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/199511/amd-launches-radeon-r5-230-in-the-retail-channel-gigabyte-outs-its-offering.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering |author=btarunr |date=3 April 2014 |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| {{dts|2014|04|03|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/199511/amd-launches-radeon-r5-230-in-the-retail-channel-gigabyte-outs-its-offering.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering |author=btarunr |date=3 April 2014 |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| 160:8:4
 
| 160:8:4
−
| 625<br />(-)
+
| 625
−
| 1066
 
 
| 2.5
 
| 2.5
 
| 5
 
| 5
 +
| 200
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
−
| 64
+
| 1066
−
| DDR3
 
 
| 8.53
 
| 8.53
−
| 200
 
−
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 19<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2014/2014040401_AMD_Launches_Radeon_R5_230_For_Retail_Market.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market |last=Wiles |first=Debbie |date=4 April 2014 |publisher=CPU-World.com |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| 19<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2014/2014040401_AMD_Launches_Radeon_R5_230_For_Retail_Market.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market |last=Wiles |first=Debbie |date=4 April 2014 |publisher=CPU-World.com |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| {{unk}}
 
| {{unk}}
Line 87: Line 76:
 
| {{unk}}
 
| {{unk}}
 
| 160:8:4
 
| 160:8:4
−
| 775<br />(?)
+
| 775
−
| 1800
 
 
| 3.1
 
| 3.1
 
| 6.2
 
| 6.2
 +
| 248
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
−
| 64
+
| 1800
−
| DDR3
 
 
| 14.4
 
| 14.4
−
| 248
 
−
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 35<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2502/radeon-r5-235-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=10 July 2015}}</ref>
 
| 35<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2502/radeon-r5-235-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=10 July 2015}}</ref>
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
Line 103: Line 91:
 
| {{unk}}
 
| {{unk}}
 
| 160:8:4
 
| 160:8:4
−
| 875<br />(?)
+
| 875
−
| 1800
 
 
| 3.5
 
| 3.5
 
| 7.0
 
| 7.0
 +
| 280
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
−
| 64
+
| 1800
−
| DDR3
 
 
| 14.4
 
| 14.4
−
| 280
 
−
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 18
 
| 18
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
Line 121: Line 108:
 
| rowspan=3  | {{val|1040|e=6}}<br />90 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=3  | {{val|1040|e=6}}<br />90 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 320:20:8
 
| 320:20:8
−
| 730<br />(780)
+
| 730<br />''780''
−
| 1800<br />?
 
 
| 5.84
 
| 5.84
 
| 14.6
 
| 14.6
 +
| 467.2<br />''499.2''
 +
| 29.2
 +
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
−
| 128
+
| 1800<br />?
−
| DDR3<br />GDDR5
 
 
| 28.8<br />?
 
| 28.8<br />?
−
| 467.2<br />499.2
 
−
| 29.2
 
 
| 50
 
| 50
 
| rowspan=3  | PCIe 3.0 ×8
 
| rowspan=3  | PCIe 3.0 ×8
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
−
| rowspan=5  | 4.5<br />1.2
 
−
| rowspan=16 | 1.0
 
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
 
|-
 
|-
Line 141: Line 124:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 320:20:8
 
| 320:20:8
−
| 730<br />(780)
+
| 730<br />''780''
−
| 1800<br />4500
 
 
| 5.84
 
| 5.84
 
| 14.6
 
| 14.6
 +
| 467.2<br />''499.2''
 +
| 29.2
 +
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
−
| 128
+
| 1800<br />4500
−
| DDR3<br />GDDR5
 
 
| 28.8<br />72
 
| 28.8<br />72
−
| 467.2<br />499.2
 
−
| 29.2
 
 
| 30
 
| 30
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $69
 
| $69
 
|-
 
|-
Line 159: Line 140:
 
| 384:24:8
 
| 384:24:8
 
| 1000<br />(1050)
 
| 1000<br />(1050)
−
| 1800<br />4600
 
 
| 8
 
| 8
 
| 24
 
| 24
 +
| 768<br />806.4
 +
| 48
 +
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
−
| 128
+
| 1800<br />4600
−
| DDR3<br />GDDR5
 
 
| 73.6
 
| 73.6
−
| 768<br />806.4
 
−
| 48
 
 
| 75  
 
| 75  
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $89
 
| $89
 
|-
 
|-
Line 176: Line 155:
 
| rowspan=2  | {{val|1500|e=6}}<br />123 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=2  | {{val|1500|e=6}}<br />123 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 512:32:16
 
| 512:32:16
−
| 800<br />(-)
+
| 800
−
| 4500
 
 
| 12.8
 
| 12.8
 
| 25.6
 
| 25.6
 +
| 819.2
 +
| 51.2
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
−
| 128
+
| 4500
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 72
 
| 72
−
| 819.2
 
−
| 51.2
 
 
| 55  
 
| 55  
 
| rowspan=13 | PCIe 3.0 ×16
 
| rowspan=13 | PCIe 3.0 ×16
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| {{unknown}}
 
| {{unknown}}
 
|-
 
|-
Line 194: Line 171:
 
| {{dts|2014|02|10|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2014|02|10|format=mdy}}
 
| 640:40:16
 
| 640:40:16
−
| 1000<br />(-)
+
| 1000
−
| 4500
 
 
| 16
 
| 16
 
| 40
 
| 40
 +
| 1280
 +
| 80
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
−
| 128
+
| 4500
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 72
 
| 72
−
| 1280
 
−
| 80
 
 
| 95
 
| 95
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $99
 
| $99
 
|-
 
|-
Line 213: Line 188:
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|2080|e=6}}<br />160 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|2080|e=6}}<br />160 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 768:48:16
 
| 768:48:16
−
| 1000<br />(-)
+
| 1000
−
| 6000
 
 
| 16
 
| 16
 
| 48
 
| 48
 +
| 1536
 +
| 96
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
−
| 128
+
| 6000
−
| GDDR5
 
−
| 96
 
−
| 1536
 
 
| 96
 
| 96
 
| 95
 
| 95
−
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
−
| rowspan=2 | 4.5<br />2.0{{efn|name="OpenCL2.0-drv"|The AMD OpenCL 2.0 driver is compatible with AMD graphics products based on GCN first generation products or higher.<ref name="ocl2drv">{{Cite web|url=http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/OpenCL2-Driver.aspx|title=AMD OpenCL™ 2.0 Driver|website=support.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-14}}</ref>}}
 
 
| $109
 
| $109
 
|-
 
|-
Line 231: Line 203:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 896:56:16
 
| 896:56:16
−
| 1100<br />(-)
+
| 1100
−
| 6500
 
 
| 17.6
 
| 17.6
 
| 61.6
 
| 61.6
 +
| 1971.2
 +
| 123.2
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
−
| 128
+
| 6500
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 104
 
| 104
−
| 1971.2
 
−
| 123.2
 
 
| 115
 
| 115
−
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $139
 
| $139
 
|-
 
|-
Line 250: Line 220:
 
| rowspan=3 | {{val|2800|e=6}}<br />212 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=3 | {{val|2800|e=6}}<br />212 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 1024:64:32
 
| 1024:64:32
−
| 900<br />(925)
+
| 900<br />''925''
−
| 5600
 
 
| 28.8
 
| 28.8
 
| 57.6
 
| 57.6
 +
| 1843.2
 +
| 115.2
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
−
| 256
+
| 5600
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 179.2
 
| 179.2
−
| 1843.2
 
−
| 115.2
 
 
| 150
 
| 150
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
−
| rowspan=5 | 4.5 <br /> 1.2
 
 
| $149
 
| $149
 
|-
 
|-
Line 268: Line 235:
 
| {{dts|2013|11|13|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|11|13|format=mdy}}
 
| 1280:80:32
 
| 1280:80:32
−
| 900<br />(925)
+
| 900<br />''925''
−
| 5600
 
 
| 28.8
 
| 28.8
 
| 72
 
| 72
 +
| 2304<br />''2368''
 +
| 144<br />''148''
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
−
| 256
+
| 5600
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 179.2
 
| 179.2
−
| 2304<br />2368
 
−
| 144<br />148
 
 
| 150
 
| 150
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $179
 
| $179
 
|-
 
|-
Line 285: Line 250:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 1280:80:32
 
| 1280:80:32
−
| 1000<br />(1050)
+
| 1000<br />''1050''
−
| 5600
 
 
| 32
 
| 32
 
| 80
 
| 80
 +
| 2560<br />''2688''
 +
| 160<br />''168''
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048<br />4096
 
| 2048<br />4096
−
| 256
+
| 5600
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 179.2
 
| 179.2
−
| 2560<br />2688
 
−
| 160<br />168
 
 
| 180
 
| 180
−
| 12.0 (11_1
 
 
| $199
 
| $199
 
|-
 
|-
Line 303: Line 266:
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|4313|e=6}}<br />352 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|4313|e=6}}<br />352 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 1792:112:32
 
| 1792:112:32
−
| 827<br />(933)
+
| 827<br />''933''
−
| 5000
 
 
| 26.5
 
| 26.5
 
| 92.6
 
| 92.6
 +
| 2964<br />''3343.9''
 +
| 741<br />''836''
 +
| GDDR5<br />384
 
| 3072
 
| 3072
−
| 384
+
| 5000
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 240
 
| 240
−
| 2964<br />3343.9
 
−
| 741<br />836
 
 
| 250
 
| 250
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $249
 
| $249
 
|-
 
|-
Line 320: Line 281:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 2048:128:32
 
| 2048:128:32
−
| 850<br />(1000)
+
| 850<br />''1000''
−
| 6000
 
 
| 27.2&ndash;32
 
| 27.2&ndash;32
 
| 109&ndash;128
 
| 109&ndash;128
 +
| 3481.6<br />4096
 +
| 870.4<br />1024
 +
| GDDR5<br />384
 
| 3072
 
| 3072
−
| 384
+
| 6000
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 288
 
| 288
−
| 3481.6<br />4096
 
−
| 870.4<br />1024
 
 
| 250
 
| 250
−
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $299
 
| $299
 
|-
 
|-
Line 339: Line 298:
 
| {{val|5000|e=6}}<br />359 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="Hexus R9 285" />
 
| {{val|5000|e=6}}<br />359 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="Hexus R9 285" />
 
| 1792:112:32
 
| 1792:112:32
−
| 918<br />(-)
+
| 918
−
| 5500
 
 
| 29.4
 
| 29.4
 
| 102.8
 
| 102.8
 +
| 3290
 +
| 206.6<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |page=17 |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
−
| 256
+
| 5500
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}}
 
| 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}}
−
| 3290
 
−
| 206.6<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |page=17 |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>
 
 
| 190
 
| 190
−
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
−
| rowspan=4 | 4.5<br />2.0
 
 
| $249
 
| $249
 
|-
 
|-
Line 359: Line 315:
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />438 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="AnandTech R9 290X">{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/ |title=The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=24 October 2013 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref>
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />438 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="AnandTech R9 290X">{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/ |title=The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=24 October 2013 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref>
 
| 2560:160:64
 
| 2560:160:64
−
| up to 947{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"|Base clock of '''R9 290''' and '''R9 290X''' will maintain at 947&nbsp;MHz and 1000&nbsp;MHz before reaching 95&nbsp;°C, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290-review-benchmark,3659.html |title=AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent? |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=5 November 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>}}<br />(-)
+
| up to 947{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"|Base clock of '''R9 290''' and '''R9 290X''' will maintain at 947&nbsp;MHz and 1000&nbsp;MHz before reaching 95&nbsp;°C, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290-review-benchmark,3659.html |title=AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent? |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=5 November 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>}}
−
| 5000
 
 
| 60.608
 
| 60.608
 
| 151.52
 
| 151.52
 +
| 4848.6
 +
| 606.1
 +
| GDDR5<br />512
 
| 4096
 
| 4096
−
| 512
+
| 5000
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 320
 
| 320
−
| 4848.6
 
−
| 606.1
 
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP">{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/fast-amd-radeon-r9-nano-find/ |title=AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X |last=Moammer |first=Khalid |date=21 June 2015 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=25 July 2015}}</ref>
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP">{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/fast-amd-radeon-r9-nano-find/ |title=AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X |last=Moammer |first=Khalid |date=21 June 2015 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=25 July 2015}}</ref>
−
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $399
 
| $399
 
|-
 
|-
Line 376: Line 330:
 
| {{dts|2013|10|24|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|10|24|format=mdy}}
 
| 2816:176:64
 
| 2816:176:64
−
| 1000{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"}}<br />(-)
+
| 1000{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"}}
−
| 5000
 
 
| 64
 
| 64
 
| 176
 
| 176
 +
| 5632
 +
| 704
 +
| GDDR5<br />512
 
| 4096<br />8192
 
| 4096<br />8192
−
| 512
+
| 5000
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 320
 
| 320
−
| 5632
 
−
| 704
 
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP" />
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP" />
−
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $549
 
| $549
 
|-
 
|-
Line 394: Line 346:
 
| 2× {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />2× 438 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 2× {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />2× 438 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 2× 2816:176:64
 
| 2× 2816:176:64
−
| 1018<br />(-)
+
| 1018
−
| 5000
 
 
| 2× 65.152
 
| 2× 65.152
 
| 2× 179.168
 
| 2× 179.168
 +
| 2× 5733.376
 +
| 2× 716.672
 +
| GDDR5<br />512
 
| 2× 4096
 
| 2× 4096
−
| 2× 512
+
| 5000
−
| GDDR5
 
 
| 2× 320
 
| 2× 320
−
| 2× 5733.376
 
−
| 2× 716.672
 
 
| 500
 
| 500
−
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $1499
 
| $1499
 
|-
 
|-
Line 412: Line 362:
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
−
! rowspan=2 | Core config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
+
! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
−
! Core ([[Hertz|MHz]])<br />(Boost)
+
! Clock{{efn|name="boost"}} ([[Hertz|MHz]])
−
! Memory ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
+
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)
−
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)
−
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]
 +
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]
 +
! Bus&nbsp;type&nbsp;&<br />width ([[bit]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
−
! Bus width ([[bit]])
+
! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
−
! Bus type
+
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
−
! Bandwidth ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
+
! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]])
−
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]<br />(Boost)
 
−
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]<br />(Boost)
 
−
! rowspan=2 | TDP ([[Watt|W]])
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
−
! [[Direct3D]]
 
−
! [[OpenGL]]<br />[[OpenCL]]
 
−
! [[Vulkan (API)|Vulkan]]
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
|-
 
|-
−
! colspan=2 | Clock rate
+
! colspan=2 | Core
−
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="pixel fillrate"}}{{efn|name="texture fillrate"}}
+
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="texture fill"}}{{efn|name="pixel fill"}}
 +
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
−
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="FLOPS"|Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a [[Multiply–accumulate operation#Fused multiply–add|FMA]] operation. Double precision performance is 1/16 of the single precision performance on GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/3 |title=The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming for the Top |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=2 July 2015 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref> 1/2 on GCN 2<sup>nd</sup> gen (capped to 1/8 on high-end consumer Radeon cards, and 1/16 on mid- and entry-level cards),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290x-hawaii-review,3650.html |title=Radeon R9 290X Review AMD's Back In Ultra-High-End Gaming |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=23 October 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/3 |title=The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming For the Top |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=2 July 2015 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref> and 1/4 on GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen (capped to 1/16 on mid- and entry-level cards).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/5261/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review/4 |title=AMD Radeon HD 7970 Review: 28nm And Graphics Core Next, Together As One |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=22 December 2011 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref>}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
 
−
! colspan=3 | [[Application programming interface|API]] support (version)
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
{{notelist|refs=
 
{{notelist|refs=
 +
{{efn|name="boost"|Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in ''italic''.}}
 
{{efn|name="cconfig"|[[Unified shader model|Unified Shaders]] : [[Texture mapping unit|Texture Mapping Units]] : [[Render output unit|Render Output Units]]}}
 
{{efn|name="cconfig"|[[Unified shader model|Unified Shaders]] : [[Texture mapping unit|Texture Mapping Units]] : [[Render output unit|Render Output Units]]}}
−
{{efn|name="pixel fillrate"|Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of '''ROP'''s multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
+
{{efn|name="texture fill"|Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Texture Mapping Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
−
{{efn|name="texture fillrate"|Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of '''TMU'''s multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
+
{{efn|name="pixel fill"|Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Render Output Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
 +
{{efn|name="FLOPS"|Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a [[Multiply–accumulate operation#Fused multiply–add|FMA]] operation.}}
 
}}
 
}}
  

Revision as of 22:49, 16 August 2017

Model
(Codename)
Launch Architecture
(Fab)
Transistors
Die Size
Core Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4]
(GFLOPS)
Memory TBP (W) Bus interface Release Price (USD)
Config[lower-alpha 5] Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) Texture (GT/s) Pixel (GP/s) Single Double Bus type &
width (bit)
Size (MiB) Clock (MT/s) Band-
width (GB/s)
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 210[1]
(Cedar)
Template:Unk Terascale 2
(40 nm)
Template:Val
59 mm2
80:8:4 400 1.6 3.2 64 Template:N/A DDR3
64
256 900 7.2 19 PCIe 2.1 ×16 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 220[1]
(Caicos Pro)
Template:Unk Template:Val
67 mm2
80:8:4 625
650
2.5 5 200 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024 1066 8.53 18 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 230[2]
(Caicos Pro)
April 3, 2014[3] 160:8:4 625 2.5 5 200 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024
2048
1066 8.53 19[4] Template:Unk
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 235[1]
(Caicos XT)
Template:Unk 160:8:4 775 3.1 6.2 248 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024 1800 14.4 35[5] OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 235X[1]
(Caicos XT)
Template:Unk 160:8:4 875 3.5 7.0 280 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024 1800 14.4 18 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 240[1]
(Oland)
November 1, 2013[6] GCN 1st gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
90 mm2
320:20:8 730
780
5.84 14.6 467.2
499.2
29.2 DDR3
GDDR5
128
1024
2048
1800
?
28.8
?
50 PCIe 3.0 ×8 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 240[7]
(Oland Pro)
August 8, 2013 320:20:8 730
780
5.84 14.6 467.2
499.2
29.2 DDR3
GDDR5
128
2048 1800
4500
28.8
72
30 $69
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 250[7]
(Oland XT)
August 8, 2013 384:24:8 1000
(1050)
8 24 768
806.4
48 DDR3
GDDR5
128
1024
2048
1800
4600
73.6 75 $89
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 250E[8]
(Cape Verde Pro)
December 21, 2013 Template:Val
123 mm2
512:32:16 800 12.8 25.6 819.2 51.2 GDDR5
128
1024
2048
4500 72 55 PCIe 3.0 ×16 Template:Unknown
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 250X[7]
(Cape Verde XT)
February 10, 2014 640:40:16 1000 16 40 1280 80 GDDR5
128
1024
2048
4500 72 95 $99
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 260[7]
(Bonaire)
December 17, 2013 GCN 2nd gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
160 mm2
768:48:16 1000 16 48 1536 96 GDDR5
128
1024 6000 96 95 $109
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 260X[7]
(Bonaire XTX)
August 8, 2013 896:56:16 1100 17.6 61.6 1971.2 123.2 GDDR5
128
1024
2048
6500 104 115 $139
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 265[7]
(Pitcairn Pro)
February 13, 2014 GCN 1st gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
212 mm2
1024:64:32 900
925
28.8 57.6 1843.2 115.2 GDDR5
256
2048 5600 179.2 150 $149
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 270[9]
(Pitcairn XT)
November 13, 2013 1280:80:32 900
925
28.8 72 2304
2368
144
148
GDDR5
256
2048 5600 179.2 150 $179
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 270X)[9]
(Pitcairn XT)
August 8, 2013 1280:80:32 1000
1050
32 80 2560
2688
160
168
GDDR5
256
2048
4096
5600 179.2 180 $199
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 280[9]
(Tahiti Pro)
March 4, 2014 Template:Val
352 mm2
1792:112:32 827
933
26.5 92.6 2964
3343.9
741
836
GDDR5
384
3072 5000 240 250 $249
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 280X[9]
(Tahiti XTL)[10]
August 8, 2013 2048:128:32 850
1000
27.2–32 109–128 3481.6
4096
870.4
1024
GDDR5
384
3072 6000 288 250 $299
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 285[9]
(Tonga Pro)
September 2, 2014 GCN 3rd gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
359 mm2[11]
1792:112:32 918 29.4 102.8 3290 206.6[12] GDDR5
256
2048 5500 176[lower-alpha 6] 190 $249
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 290[9]
(Hawaii Pro)
November 5, 2013 GCN 2nd gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
438 mm2[14]
2560:160:64 up to 947[lower-alpha 7] 60.608 151.52 4848.6 606.1 GDDR5
512
4096 5000 320 250[16] $399
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 290X[9]
(Hawaii XT)
October 24, 2013 2816:176:64 1000[lower-alpha 7] 64 176 5632 704 GDDR5
512
4096
8192
5000 320 250[16] $549
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 295X2[9][17]
(Vesuvius)
April 8, 2014 2× Template:Val
2× 438 mm2
2× 2816:176:64 1018 2× 65.152 2× 179.168 2× 5733.376 2× 716.672 GDDR5
512
2× 4096 5000 2× 320 500 $1499
Model
(Codename)
Launch Architecture
(Fab)
Transistors
Die Size
Config[lower-alpha 5] Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) Pixel (GP/s) Texture (GT/s) Single Double Bus type &
width (bit)
Size (MiB) Clock (MT/s) Band-
width (GB/s)
TBP (W) Bus interface Release Price (USD)
Core Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4]
(GFLOPS)
Memory
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in italic.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of Texture Mapping Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of Render Output Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a FMA operation.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Unified Shaders : Texture Mapping Units : Render Output Units
  6. ↑ The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1st gen and 2nd gen cards) in certain situations.[11][13]
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Base clock of R9 290 and R9 290X will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.[15]


References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | OEM | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
  2. ↑ "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
  3. ↑ btarunr (3 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  4. ↑ Wiles, Debbie (4 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market". CPU-World.com. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  5. ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
  6. ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 "Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
  8. ↑ "AMD Radeon R7 250E". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 "Radeon™ R9 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
  10. ↑ Mujtaba, Hassan (26 October 2013). "AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Sandhu, Tarinder (2 September 2014). "Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga)". Hexus. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  12. ↑ Smith, Ryan (10 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC". AnandTech. Purch Group. p. 17. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  13. ↑ Hruska, Joel (2 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3rd gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia's GTX 760". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  14. ↑ Smith, Ryan (24 October 2013). "The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
  15. ↑ Angelini, Chris (5 November 2013). "AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent?". Tom's Hardware. Purch Group. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Moammer, Khalid (21 June 2015). "AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
  17. ↑ Shilov, Anton (4 April 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs". KitGuru. Korona Solutions. Retrieved 6 April 2014.