Difference between revisions of "Template:AMD Radeon Rx 200"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(mdy format like other entries)
blackwiki>Wikiinger
(Streamlined Core, Memory columns, nicer Boost values, removed API columns)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
! rowspan=2 | Core config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
+
! colspan=2 | Core
! colspan=2 | Clock rate
+
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="texture fill"}}{{efn|name="pixel fill"}}
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="pixel fillrate"}}{{efn|name="texture fillrate"}}
+
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
+
! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]])
! rowspan=2 | TDP ([[Watt|Watts]])
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
! colspan=3 | [[Application programming interface|API]] support (version)
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
|-
 
|-
! Core ([[Hertz|MHz]])<br />(Boost)
+
! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
! Memory ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
+
! Clock{{efn|name="boost"}} ([[Hertz|MHz]])
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)
 +
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]
 +
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]
 +
! Bus&nbsp;type&nbsp;&<br />width ([[bit]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
! Bus width ([[bit]])
+
! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
! Bus type
+
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
! Bandwidth ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
 
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]<br />(Boost)
 
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]<br />(Boost)
 
! [[Direct3D]]
 
! [[OpenGL]]<br />[[OpenCL]]
 
! [[Vulkan (API)|Vulkan]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 210<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Cedar)
 
! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 210<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Cedar)
Line 34: Line 29:
 
| {{val|292|e=6}}<br />59 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| {{val|292|e=6}}<br />59 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 80:8:4
 
| 80:8:4
| 400<br />(?)
+
| 400
| 900
 
 
| 1.6
 
| 1.6
 
| 3.2
 
| 3.2
 +
| 64
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 256
 
| 256
| 64
+
| 900
| DDR3
 
 
| 7.2
 
| 7.2
| 64
 
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 19
 
| 19
 
| rowspan=5 | PCIe 2.1 ×16
 
| rowspan=5 | PCIe 2.1 ×16
| rowspan="5" | 11.0
 
| rowspan="5" | 4.4<br />1.2
 
| rowspan=5 {{N/A}}
 
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
 
|-
 
|-
Line 55: Line 46:
 
| rowspan=4 | {{val|370|e=6}}<br />67 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=4 | {{val|370|e=6}}<br />67 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 80:8:4
 
| 80:8:4
| 625<br />(650)
+
| 625<br />''650''
| 1066
 
 
| 2.5
 
| 2.5
 
| 5
 
| 5
 +
| 200
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
| 64
+
| 1066
| DDR3
 
 
| 8.53
 
| 8.53
| 200
 
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 18
 
| 18
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
Line 71: Line 61:
 
| {{dts|2014|04|03|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/199511/amd-launches-radeon-r5-230-in-the-retail-channel-gigabyte-outs-its-offering.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering |author=btarunr |date=3 April 2014 |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| {{dts|2014|04|03|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/199511/amd-launches-radeon-r5-230-in-the-retail-channel-gigabyte-outs-its-offering.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering |author=btarunr |date=3 April 2014 |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| 160:8:4
 
| 160:8:4
| 625<br />(-)
+
| 625
| 1066
 
 
| 2.5
 
| 2.5
 
| 5
 
| 5
 +
| 200
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
| 64
+
| 1066
| DDR3
 
 
| 8.53
 
| 8.53
| 200
 
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 19<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2014/2014040401_AMD_Launches_Radeon_R5_230_For_Retail_Market.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market |last=Wiles |first=Debbie |date=4 April 2014 |publisher=CPU-World.com |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| 19<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2014/2014040401_AMD_Launches_Radeon_R5_230_For_Retail_Market.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market |last=Wiles |first=Debbie |date=4 April 2014 |publisher=CPU-World.com |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref>
 
| {{unk}}
 
| {{unk}}
Line 87: Line 76:
 
| {{unk}}
 
| {{unk}}
 
| 160:8:4
 
| 160:8:4
| 775<br />(?)
+
| 775
| 1800
 
 
| 3.1
 
| 3.1
 
| 6.2
 
| 6.2
 +
| 248
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
| 64
+
| 1800
| DDR3
 
 
| 14.4
 
| 14.4
| 248
 
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 35<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2502/radeon-r5-235-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=10 July 2015}}</ref>
 
| 35<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2502/radeon-r5-235-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=10 July 2015}}</ref>
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
Line 103: Line 91:
 
| {{unk}}
 
| {{unk}}
 
| 160:8:4
 
| 160:8:4
| 875<br />(?)
+
| 875
| 1800
 
 
| 3.5
 
| 3.5
 
| 7.0
 
| 7.0
 +
| 280
 +
| {{N/A}}
 +
| DDR3<br />64
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
| 64
+
| 1800
| DDR3
 
 
| 14.4
 
| 14.4
| 280
 
| {{N/A}}
 
 
| 18
 
| 18
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
Line 121: Line 108:
 
| rowspan=3  | {{val|1040|e=6}}<br />90 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=3  | {{val|1040|e=6}}<br />90 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 320:20:8
 
| 320:20:8
| 730<br />(780)
+
| 730<br />''780''
| 1800<br />?
 
 
| 5.84
 
| 5.84
 
| 14.6
 
| 14.6
 +
| 467.2<br />''499.2''
 +
| 29.2
 +
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
| 128
+
| 1800<br />?
| DDR3<br />GDDR5
 
 
| 28.8<br />?
 
| 28.8<br />?
| 467.2<br />499.2
 
| 29.2
 
 
| 50
 
| 50
 
| rowspan=3  | PCIe 3.0 ×8
 
| rowspan=3  | PCIe 3.0 ×8
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
| rowspan=5  | 4.5<br />1.2
 
| rowspan=16 | 1.0
 
 
| OEM
 
| OEM
 
|-
 
|-
Line 141: Line 124:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 320:20:8
 
| 320:20:8
| 730<br />(780)
+
| 730<br />''780''
| 1800<br />4500
 
 
| 5.84
 
| 5.84
 
| 14.6
 
| 14.6
 +
| 467.2<br />''499.2''
 +
| 29.2
 +
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
| 128
+
| 1800<br />4500
| DDR3<br />GDDR5
 
 
| 28.8<br />72
 
| 28.8<br />72
| 467.2<br />499.2
 
| 29.2
 
 
| 30
 
| 30
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $69
 
| $69
 
|-
 
|-
Line 159: Line 140:
 
| 384:24:8
 
| 384:24:8
 
| 1000<br />(1050)
 
| 1000<br />(1050)
| 1800<br />4600
 
 
| 8
 
| 8
 
| 24
 
| 24
 +
| 768<br />806.4
 +
| 48
 +
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
| 128
+
| 1800<br />4600
| DDR3<br />GDDR5
 
 
| 73.6
 
| 73.6
| 768<br />806.4
 
| 48
 
 
| 75  
 
| 75  
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $89
 
| $89
 
|-
 
|-
Line 176: Line 155:
 
| rowspan=2  | {{val|1500|e=6}}<br />123 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=2  | {{val|1500|e=6}}<br />123 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 512:32:16
 
| 512:32:16
| 800<br />(-)
+
| 800
| 4500
 
 
| 12.8
 
| 12.8
 
| 25.6
 
| 25.6
 +
| 819.2
 +
| 51.2
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
| 128
+
| 4500
| GDDR5
 
 
| 72
 
| 72
| 819.2
 
| 51.2
 
 
| 55  
 
| 55  
 
| rowspan=13 | PCIe 3.0 ×16
 
| rowspan=13 | PCIe 3.0 ×16
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| {{unknown}}
 
| {{unknown}}
 
|-
 
|-
Line 194: Line 171:
 
| {{dts|2014|02|10|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2014|02|10|format=mdy}}
 
| 640:40:16
 
| 640:40:16
| 1000<br />(-)
+
| 1000
| 4500
 
 
| 16
 
| 16
 
| 40
 
| 40
 +
| 1280
 +
| 80
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
| 128
+
| 4500
| GDDR5
 
 
| 72
 
| 72
| 1280
 
| 80
 
 
| 95
 
| 95
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $99
 
| $99
 
|-
 
|-
Line 213: Line 188:
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|2080|e=6}}<br />160 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|2080|e=6}}<br />160 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 768:48:16
 
| 768:48:16
| 1000<br />(-)
+
| 1000
| 6000
 
 
| 16
 
| 16
 
| 48
 
| 48
 +
| 1536
 +
| 96
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024
 
| 1024
| 128
+
| 6000
| GDDR5
 
| 96
 
| 1536
 
 
| 96
 
| 96
 
| 95
 
| 95
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
| rowspan=2 | 4.5<br />2.0{{efn|name="OpenCL2.0-drv"|The AMD OpenCL 2.0 driver is compatible with AMD graphics products based on GCN first generation products or higher.<ref name="ocl2drv">{{Cite web|url=http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/OpenCL2-Driver.aspx|title=AMD OpenCL™ 2.0 Driver|website=support.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-14}}</ref>}}
 
 
| $109
 
| $109
 
|-
 
|-
Line 231: Line 203:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 896:56:16
 
| 896:56:16
| 1100<br />(-)
+
| 1100
| 6500
 
 
| 17.6
 
| 17.6
 
| 61.6
 
| 61.6
 +
| 1971.2
 +
| 123.2
 +
| GDDR5<br />128
 
| 1024<br />2048
 
| 1024<br />2048
| 128
+
| 6500
| GDDR5
 
 
| 104
 
| 104
| 1971.2
 
| 123.2
 
 
| 115
 
| 115
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $139
 
| $139
 
|-
 
|-
Line 250: Line 220:
 
| rowspan=3 | {{val|2800|e=6}}<br />212 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=3 | {{val|2800|e=6}}<br />212 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 1024:64:32
 
| 1024:64:32
| 900<br />(925)
+
| 900<br />''925''
| 5600
 
 
| 28.8
 
| 28.8
 
| 57.6
 
| 57.6
 +
| 1843.2
 +
| 115.2
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
| 256
+
| 5600
| GDDR5
 
 
| 179.2
 
| 179.2
| 1843.2
 
| 115.2
 
 
| 150
 
| 150
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
| rowspan=5 | 4.5 <br /> 1.2
 
 
| $149
 
| $149
 
|-
 
|-
Line 268: Line 235:
 
| {{dts|2013|11|13|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|11|13|format=mdy}}
 
| 1280:80:32
 
| 1280:80:32
| 900<br />(925)
+
| 900<br />''925''
| 5600
 
 
| 28.8
 
| 28.8
 
| 72
 
| 72
 +
| 2304<br />''2368''
 +
| 144<br />''148''
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
| 256
+
| 5600
| GDDR5
 
 
| 179.2
 
| 179.2
| 2304<br />2368
 
| 144<br />148
 
 
| 150
 
| 150
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $179
 
| $179
 
|-
 
|-
Line 285: Line 250:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 1280:80:32
 
| 1280:80:32
| 1000<br />(1050)
+
| 1000<br />''1050''
| 5600
 
 
| 32
 
| 32
 
| 80
 
| 80
 +
| 2560<br />''2688''
 +
| 160<br />''168''
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048<br />4096
 
| 2048<br />4096
| 256
+
| 5600
| GDDR5
 
 
| 179.2
 
| 179.2
| 2560<br />2688
 
| 160<br />168
 
 
| 180
 
| 180
| 12.0 (11_1
 
 
| $199
 
| $199
 
|-
 
|-
Line 303: Line 266:
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|4313|e=6}}<br />352 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|4313|e=6}}<br />352 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 1792:112:32
 
| 1792:112:32
| 827<br />(933)
+
| 827<br />''933''
| 5000
 
 
| 26.5
 
| 26.5
 
| 92.6
 
| 92.6
 +
| 2964<br />''3343.9''
 +
| 741<br />''836''
 +
| GDDR5<br />384
 
| 3072
 
| 3072
| 384
+
| 5000
| GDDR5
 
 
| 240
 
| 240
| 2964<br />3343.9
 
| 741<br />836
 
 
| 250
 
| 250
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $249
 
| $249
 
|-
 
|-
Line 320: Line 281:
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}
 
| 2048:128:32
 
| 2048:128:32
| 850<br />(1000)
+
| 850<br />''1000''
| 6000
 
 
| 27.2&ndash;32
 
| 27.2&ndash;32
 
| 109&ndash;128
 
| 109&ndash;128
 +
| 3481.6<br />4096
 +
| 870.4<br />1024
 +
| GDDR5<br />384
 
| 3072
 
| 3072
| 384
+
| 6000
| GDDR5
 
 
| 288
 
| 288
| 3481.6<br />4096
 
| 870.4<br />1024
 
 
| 250
 
| 250
| 12.0 (11_1)
 
 
| $299
 
| $299
 
|-
 
|-
Line 339: Line 298:
 
| {{val|5000|e=6}}<br />359 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="Hexus R9 285" />
 
| {{val|5000|e=6}}<br />359 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="Hexus R9 285" />
 
| 1792:112:32
 
| 1792:112:32
| 918<br />(-)
+
| 918
| 5500
 
 
| 29.4
 
| 29.4
 
| 102.8
 
| 102.8
 +
| 3290
 +
| 206.6<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |page=17 |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>
 +
| GDDR5<br />256
 
| 2048
 
| 2048
| 256
+
| 5500
| GDDR5
 
 
| 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}}
 
| 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}}
| 3290
 
| 206.6<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |page=17 |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>
 
 
| 190
 
| 190
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
| rowspan=4 | 4.5<br />2.0
 
 
| $249
 
| $249
 
|-
 
|-
Line 359: Line 315:
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />438 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="AnandTech R9 290X">{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/ |title=The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=24 October 2013 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref>
 
| rowspan=2 | {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />438 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="AnandTech R9 290X">{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/ |title=The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=24 October 2013 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref>
 
| 2560:160:64
 
| 2560:160:64
| up to 947{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"|Base clock of '''R9 290''' and '''R9 290X''' will maintain at 947&nbsp;MHz and 1000&nbsp;MHz before reaching 95&nbsp;°C, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290-review-benchmark,3659.html |title=AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent? |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=5 November 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>}}<br />(-)
+
| up to 947{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"|Base clock of '''R9 290''' and '''R9 290X''' will maintain at 947&nbsp;MHz and 1000&nbsp;MHz before reaching 95&nbsp;°C, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290-review-benchmark,3659.html |title=AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent? |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=5 November 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>}}
| 5000
 
 
| 60.608
 
| 60.608
 
| 151.52
 
| 151.52
 +
| 4848.6
 +
| 606.1
 +
| GDDR5<br />512
 
| 4096
 
| 4096
| 512
+
| 5000
| GDDR5
 
 
| 320
 
| 320
| 4848.6
 
| 606.1
 
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP">{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/fast-amd-radeon-r9-nano-find/ |title=AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X |last=Moammer |first=Khalid |date=21 June 2015 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=25 July 2015}}</ref>
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP">{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/fast-amd-radeon-r9-nano-find/ |title=AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X |last=Moammer |first=Khalid |date=21 June 2015 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=25 July 2015}}</ref>
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $399
 
| $399
 
|-
 
|-
Line 376: Line 330:
 
| {{dts|2013|10|24|format=mdy}}
 
| {{dts|2013|10|24|format=mdy}}
 
| 2816:176:64
 
| 2816:176:64
| 1000{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"}}<br />(-)
+
| 1000{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"}}
| 5000
 
 
| 64
 
| 64
 
| 176
 
| 176
 +
| 5632
 +
| 704
 +
| GDDR5<br />512
 
| 4096<br />8192
 
| 4096<br />8192
| 512
+
| 5000
| GDDR5
 
 
| 320
 
| 320
| 5632
 
| 704
 
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP" />
 
| 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP" />
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $549
 
| $549
 
|-
 
|-
Line 394: Line 346:
 
| 2× {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />2× 438 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 2× {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />2× 438 mm<sup>2</sup>
 
| 2× 2816:176:64
 
| 2× 2816:176:64
| 1018<br />(-)
+
| 1018
| 5000
 
 
| 2× 65.152
 
| 2× 65.152
 
| 2× 179.168
 
| 2× 179.168
 +
| 2× 5733.376
 +
| 2× 716.672
 +
| GDDR5<br />512
 
| 2× 4096
 
| 2× 4096
| 2× 512
+
| 5000
| GDDR5
 
 
| 2× 320
 
| 2× 320
| 2× 5733.376
 
| 2× 716.672
 
 
| 500
 
| 500
| 12.0 (12_0)
 
 
| $1499
 
| $1499
 
|-
 
|-
Line 412: Line 362:
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />([[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]])
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
 
! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size
! rowspan=2 | Core config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
+
! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}}
! Core ([[Hertz|MHz]])<br />(Boost)
+
! Clock{{efn|name="boost"}} ([[Hertz|MHz]])
! Memory ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
+
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)
! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s)<br />(Boost)
+
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]
 +
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]
 +
! Bus&nbsp;type&nbsp;&<br />width ([[bit]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
 
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]])
! Bus width ([[bit]])
+
! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]])
! Bus type
+
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
! Bandwidth ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s)
+
! rowspan=2 | TBP ([[Watt|W]])
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]]<br />(Boost)
 
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]]<br />(Boost)
 
! rowspan=2 | TDP ([[Watt|W]])
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
 
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface
! [[Direct3D]]
 
! [[OpenGL]]<br />[[OpenCL]]
 
! [[Vulkan (API)|Vulkan]]
 
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
! rowspan=2 | Release Price (USD)
 
|-
 
|-
! colspan=2 | Clock rate
+
! colspan=2 | Core
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="pixel fillrate"}}{{efn|name="texture fillrate"}}
+
! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="texture fill"}}{{efn|name="pixel fill"}}
 +
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
 
! colspan=4 | Memory
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="FLOPS"|Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a [[Multiply–accumulate operation#Fused multiply–add|FMA]] operation. Double precision performance is 1/16 of the single precision performance on GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/3 |title=The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming for the Top |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=2 July 2015 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref> 1/2 on GCN 2<sup>nd</sup> gen (capped to 1/8 on high-end consumer Radeon cards, and 1/16 on mid- and entry-level cards),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290x-hawaii-review,3650.html |title=Radeon R9 290X Review AMD's Back In Ultra-High-End Gaming |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=23 October 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/3 |title=The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming For the Top |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=2 July 2015 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref> and 1/4 on GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen (capped to 1/16 on mid- and entry-level cards).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/5261/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review/4 |title=AMD Radeon HD 7970 Review: 28nm And Graphics Core Next, Together As One |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=22 December 2011 |work=[[AnandTech]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=13 December 2015}}</ref>}}<br />([[GFLOPS]])
 
! colspan=3 | [[Application programming interface|API]] support (version)
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
{{notelist|refs=
 
{{notelist|refs=
 +
{{efn|name="boost"|Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in ''italic''.}}
 
{{efn|name="cconfig"|[[Unified shader model|Unified Shaders]] : [[Texture mapping unit|Texture Mapping Units]] : [[Render output unit|Render Output Units]]}}
 
{{efn|name="cconfig"|[[Unified shader model|Unified Shaders]] : [[Texture mapping unit|Texture Mapping Units]] : [[Render output unit|Render Output Units]]}}
{{efn|name="pixel fillrate"|Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of '''ROP'''s multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
+
{{efn|name="texture fill"|Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Texture Mapping Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
{{efn|name="texture fillrate"|Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of '''TMU'''s multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
+
{{efn|name="pixel fill"|Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Render Output Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}}
 +
{{efn|name="FLOPS"|Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a [[Multiply–accumulate operation#Fused multiply–add|FMA]] operation.}}
 
}}
 
}}
  

Revision as of 22:49, 16 August 2017

Model
(Codename)
Launch Architecture
(Fab)
Transistors
Die Size
Core Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4]
(GFLOPS)
Memory TBP (W) Bus interface Release Price (USD)
Config[lower-alpha 5] Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) Texture (GT/s) Pixel (GP/s) Single Double Bus type &
width (bit)
Size (MiB) Clock (MT/s) Band-
width (GB/s)
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 210[1]
(Cedar)
Template:Unk Terascale 2
(40 nm)
Template:Val
59 mm2
80:8:4 400 1.6 3.2 64 Template:N/A DDR3
64
256 900 7.2 19 PCIe 2.1 ×16 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 220[1]
(Caicos Pro)
Template:Unk Template:Val
67 mm2
80:8:4 625
650
2.5 5 200 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024 1066 8.53 18 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 230[2]
(Caicos Pro)
April 3, 2014[3] 160:8:4 625 2.5 5 200 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024
2048
1066 8.53 19[4] Template:Unk
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 235[1]
(Caicos XT)
Template:Unk 160:8:4 775 3.1 6.2 248 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024 1800 14.4 35[5] OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 235X[1]
(Caicos XT)
Template:Unk 160:8:4 875 3.5 7.0 280 Template:N/A DDR3
64
1024 1800 14.4 18 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R5 240[1]
(Oland)
November 1, 2013[6] GCN 1st gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
90 mm2
320:20:8 730
780
5.84 14.6 467.2
499.2
29.2 DDR3
GDDR5
128
1024
2048
1800
?
28.8
?
50 PCIe 3.0 ×8 OEM
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 240[7]
(Oland Pro)
August 8, 2013 320:20:8 730
780
5.84 14.6 467.2
499.2
29.2 DDR3
GDDR5
128
2048 1800
4500
28.8
72
30 $69
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 250[7]
(Oland XT)
August 8, 2013 384:24:8 1000
(1050)
8 24 768
806.4
48 DDR3
GDDR5
128
1024
2048
1800
4600
73.6 75 $89
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 250E[8]
(Cape Verde Pro)
December 21, 2013 Template:Val
123 mm2
512:32:16 800 12.8 25.6 819.2 51.2 GDDR5
128
1024
2048
4500 72 55 PCIe 3.0 ×16 Template:Unknown
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 250X[7]
(Cape Verde XT)
February 10, 2014 640:40:16 1000 16 40 1280 80 GDDR5
128
1024
2048
4500 72 95 $99
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 260[7]
(Bonaire)
December 17, 2013 GCN 2nd gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
160 mm2
768:48:16 1000 16 48 1536 96 GDDR5
128
1024 6000 96 95 $109
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 260X[7]
(Bonaire XTX)
August 8, 2013 896:56:16 1100 17.6 61.6 1971.2 123.2 GDDR5
128
1024
2048
6500 104 115 $139
Template:Rh | Radeon
R7 265[7]
(Pitcairn Pro)
February 13, 2014 GCN 1st gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
212 mm2
1024:64:32 900
925
28.8 57.6 1843.2 115.2 GDDR5
256
2048 5600 179.2 150 $149
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 270[9]
(Pitcairn XT)
November 13, 2013 1280:80:32 900
925
28.8 72 2304
2368
144
148
GDDR5
256
2048 5600 179.2 150 $179
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 270X)[9]
(Pitcairn XT)
August 8, 2013 1280:80:32 1000
1050
32 80 2560
2688
160
168
GDDR5
256
2048
4096
5600 179.2 180 $199
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 280[9]
(Tahiti Pro)
March 4, 2014 Template:Val
352 mm2
1792:112:32 827
933
26.5 92.6 2964
3343.9
741
836
GDDR5
384
3072 5000 240 250 $249
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 280X[9]
(Tahiti XTL)[10]
August 8, 2013 2048:128:32 850
1000
27.2–32 109–128 3481.6
4096
870.4
1024
GDDR5
384
3072 6000 288 250 $299
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 285[9]
(Tonga Pro)
September 2, 2014 GCN 3rd gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
359 mm2[11]
1792:112:32 918 29.4 102.8 3290 206.6[12] GDDR5
256
2048 5500 176[lower-alpha 6] 190 $249
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 290[9]
(Hawaii Pro)
November 5, 2013 GCN 2nd gen
(28 nm)
Template:Val
438 mm2[14]
2560:160:64 up to 947[lower-alpha 7] 60.608 151.52 4848.6 606.1 GDDR5
512
4096 5000 320 250[16] $399
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 290X[9]
(Hawaii XT)
October 24, 2013 2816:176:64 1000[lower-alpha 7] 64 176 5632 704 GDDR5
512
4096
8192
5000 320 250[16] $549
Template:Rh | Radeon
R9 295X2[9][17]
(Vesuvius)
April 8, 2014 Template:Val
2× 438 mm2
2× 2816:176:64 1018 2× 65.152 2× 179.168 2× 5733.376 2× 716.672 GDDR5
512
2× 4096 5000 2× 320 500 $1499
Model
(Codename)
Launch Architecture
(Fab)
Transistors
Die Size
Config[lower-alpha 5] Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) Pixel (GP/s) Texture (GT/s) Single Double Bus type &
width (bit)
Size (MiB) Clock (MT/s) Band-
width (GB/s)
TBP (W) Bus interface Release Price (USD)
Core Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4]
(GFLOPS)
Memory
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in italic.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of Texture Mapping Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of Render Output Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a FMA operation.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Unified Shaders : Texture Mapping Units : Render Output Units
  6. The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1st gen and 2nd gen cards) in certain situations.[11][13]
  7. 7.0 7.1 Base clock of R9 290 and R9 290X will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.[15]


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | OEM | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
  2. "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
  3. btarunr (3 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  4. Wiles, Debbie (4 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market". CPU-World.com. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  5. "AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
  6. "AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 "Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
  8. "AMD Radeon R7 250E". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 "Radeon™ R9 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
  10. Mujtaba, Hassan (26 October 2013). "AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Sandhu, Tarinder (2 September 2014). "Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga)". Hexus. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  12. Smith, Ryan (10 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC". AnandTech. Purch Group. p. 17. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  13. Hruska, Joel (2 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3rd gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia's GTX 760". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  14. Smith, Ryan (24 October 2013). "The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
  15. Angelini, Chris (5 November 2013). "AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent?". Tom's Hardware. Purch Group. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Moammer, Khalid (21 June 2015). "AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
  17. Shilov, Anton (4 April 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs". KitGuru. Korona Solutions. Retrieved 6 April 2014.