Difference between revisions of "Template:ARBPSCI"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
blackwiki>Ahnoneemoos
(Created page with '{{Consensus|<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big><p>The article [[{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}]], along with other articles relating to pseudoscience,...')
 
blackwiki>Callanecc
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Consensus|<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big><p>The article [[{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}]], along with other articles relating to [[pseudoscience]], is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during '''[[WP:ARBPIA|a 2006 arbitration case]]''', and [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience|supplemented by community consensus]] in November 2012.  The current restrictions are:
+
#REDIRECT [[Template:ArbComPseudoscience]]
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Neutral_point_of_view_as_applied_to_science|Neutral point of view as applied to science]]:''' [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to [[pseudoscience]].
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Serious_encyclopedias|Serious encyclopedias]]:''' Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
 
 
 
'''The four groupings found at [[WP:PSCI]]'''
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Obvious_pseudoscience|Obvious pseudoscience]]:''' Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as [[Time Cube]], may be so labeled and categorized as such without more.
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Generally_considered_pseudoscience|Generally considered pseudoscience]]:'''  Theories which have a following, such as [[astrology]], but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Questionable_science|Questionable science]]:''' Theories which have a substantial following, such as [[psychoanalysis]], but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
 
* '''[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Alternative_theoretical_formulations|Alternative theoretical formulations]]''':  Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.}}
 
<noinclude>
 
{{documentation}}
 
[[Category:Wikipedia arbitration templates]]
 
</noinclude>
 

Revision as of 04:51, 6 January 2015