Difference between revisions of "Template:ArbCom Pseudoscience"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
blackwiki>Pigsonthewing m (Pigsonthewing moved page Template:ArbComPseudoscience to Template:ArbCom Pseudoscience: space) |
blackwiki>Valjean (move space to right spot) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* '''2. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Generally_considered_pseudoscience|Generally considered pseudoscience]]:''' Theories which have a following, such as [[astrology]], but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community, may properly contain that information and may be [[:Category:Pseudoscience|categorized as pseudoscience]]. | * '''2. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Generally_considered_pseudoscience|Generally considered pseudoscience]]:''' Theories which have a following, such as [[astrology]], but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community, may properly contain that information and may be [[:Category:Pseudoscience|categorized as pseudoscience]]. | ||
* '''3. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Questionable_science|Questionable science]]:''' Theories which have a substantial following, such as [[psychoanalysis]], but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized. | * '''3. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Questionable_science|Questionable science]]:''' Theories which have a substantial following, such as [[psychoanalysis]], but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized. | ||
| − | * '''4. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Alternative theoretical formulations|Alternative theoretical formulations]]: '''Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process. | + | * '''4. [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Alternative theoretical formulations|Alternative theoretical formulations]]:''' Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process. |
|}<noinclude> | |}<noinclude> | ||
{{Documentation}} | {{Documentation}} | ||
Revision as of 03:55, 26 August 2015
| The Arbitration Committee has [[{{safesubst:Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Shortcuts|sanctions link=cf}}|authorized]] uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to pseudoscience and fringe science, including this page. Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. |
Usage
{{ArbCom Pseudoscience}}
This template should be used on the talk pages of pages relating to pseudoscience and fringe science, broadly interpreted.
Non-administrators should be cautious when placing this notice on pages which are not clearly related to the topic area.
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:ArbCom Pseudoscience/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |