Difference between revisions of "Template:Colonial India"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dbachmann
("Independent India" is hardly part of "Colonial India".)
imported>Dbachmann
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
|- bgcolor="FFE6B5"
 
|- bgcolor="FFE6B5"
|colspan="6" align="center"|'''[[British Empire in India]]'''<br>  
+
|colspan="6" align="center"|'''[[British India]]''' 1612–1948<br>  
 
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
| [[East India Company]] || 1612–1757
 
| [[East India Company]] || 1612–1757
Line 33: Line 33:
 
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
| [[British rule in Burma]] || 1826–1948
 
| [[British rule in Burma]] || 1826–1948
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
| [[British India]] || 1600–1947
 
 
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
|- bgcolor="FADFAD"
 
| [[Princely state]]s||1765–1947
 
| [[Princely state]]s||1765–1947

Revision as of 09:02, 14 December 2009

This template has been designed so that it can be used both in articles that adopt the BC/AD date notation and those that adopt the BCE/CE date notation without forcing some articles to have inconsistent style.

It will display BCE/CE notation unless the template gives the parameter BC a value. For instance {{Colonial India}} will give BCE/CE notation, {{Colonial India|BC=1}} will give BC/AD notation.

It can be edited as normal, but with the following exception:

  • Instead of writing BCE or BC write {{#if: {{{BC|}}}|BC|BCE}}
  • Instead of writing CE or AD write {{#if: {{{BC|}}}|AD|CE}}

This functionality is necessitated by the Wikipedia:Manual of Style requirement that BC-AD and BCE-CE do not both appear in the same article.

Colonial India
Portuguese India 1510–1961
Dutch India 1605–1825
Danish India 1696–1869
French India 1759–1954
British India 1612–1948
East India Company 1612–1757
Company rule in India 1757–1857
British Raj 1858–1947
British rule in Burma 1826–1948
Princely states 1765–1947
Partition of India 1947

See also

fi:Malline:Etelä-Aasian historia