Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1951 Hawaii cyclone"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 1) |
imported>Gatoclass m (Reverted edits by Crisco 1492 (talk) to last version by Yoninah) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{DYKsubpage | |
− | + | |monthyear=June 2014 | |
− | + | |passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no--> | |
− | + | |2= | |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====1951 Hawaii cyclone==== | ====1951 Hawaii cyclone==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1951 Hawaii cyclone|1951 Hawaii cyclone}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=1951 Hawaii cyclone|1951 Hawaii cyclone}} | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> | ||
*<s> ... that a '''[[1951 Hawaii cyclone|cyclone]]''' made [[landfall (meteorology)|landfall]] in [[Hawaii]] three times?</s> | *<s> ... that a '''[[1951 Hawaii cyclone|cyclone]]''' made [[landfall (meteorology)|landfall]] in [[Hawaii]] three times?</s> | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | --> | ||
:* | :* | ||
:* ''Comment'': Going to review another DYK, even though I don't have to QPQ. (Start training :P) | :* ''Comment'': Going to review another DYK, even though I don't have to QPQ. (Start training :P) | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:CycloneIsaac|CycloneIsaac]] ([[User talk:CycloneIsaac|talk]]). Self nominated at 21:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:CycloneIsaac|CycloneIsaac]] ([[User talk:CycloneIsaac|talk]]). Self nominated at 21:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | * {{DYKmake|1951 Hawaii cyclone|CycloneIsaac}} | ||
+ | --> | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. I'm wondering, though, where you got all that information in the first paragraph under Meteorological history – are you interpreting the statistical charts in footnotes 2 and 3? Per DYK rules, you need to add a cite after the sentences describing the second and third landfalls. Also, I suggest adding "in 1951" to the hook to place it in context. No QPQ needed for under-5 DYKs nominator. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. I'm wondering, though, where you got all that information in the first paragraph under Meteorological history – are you interpreting the statistical charts in footnotes 2 and 3? Per DYK rules, you need to add a cite after the sentences describing the second and third landfalls. Also, I suggest adding "in 1951" to the hook to place it in context. No QPQ needed for under-5 DYKs nominator. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
Line 17: | Line 27: | ||
::::*Thank you. What about my question about the statistical data? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | ::::*Thank you. What about my question about the statistical data? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::*IBTRACS and best track are statistical data, and I was interpreting it.—[[User:CycloneIsaac|<font face="Courier New" color="#5C5C33">CycloneIsaac</font>]] ([[User talk:CycloneIsaac|<font face="Courier New" color="#5C5C33">Talk</font>]]) 23:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | :::::*IBTRACS and best track are statistical data, and I was interpreting it.—[[User:CycloneIsaac|<font face="Courier New" color="#5C5C33">CycloneIsaac</font>]] ([[User talk:CycloneIsaac|<font face="Courier New" color="#5C5C33">Talk</font>]]) 23:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | ::::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] OK. The hook cites are both online, but I have to AGF your interpretations of the data. ALT1 good to go. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC) | + | ::::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] OK. The hook cites are both online, but I have to AGF your interpretations of the data. ALT1 good to go. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
+ | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 14:39, 30 June 2014
DYK toolbox |
---|
1951 Hawaii cyclone
- Comment: Going to review another DYK, even though I don't have to QPQ. (Start training :P)
Moved to mainspace by CycloneIsaac (talk). Self nominated at 21:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. I'm wondering, though, where you got all that information in the first paragraph under Meteorological history – are you interpreting the statistical charts in footnotes 2 and 3? Per DYK rules, you need to add a cite after the sentences describing the second and third landfalls. Also, I suggest adding "in 1951" to the hook to place it in context. No QPQ needed for under-5 DYKs nominator. Yoninah (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I added a few more cites to footnotes 2 and 3 for the other two landfalls. I am proposing an alt hook, with your suggestion.
- ALT 1:...that in 1951, a cyclone made landfall in Hawaii three times?
- —CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. What about my question about the statistical data? Yoninah (talk) 21:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- IBTRACS and best track are statistical data, and I was interpreting it.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)