Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Milan–San Remo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dharmadhyaksha (note) |
imported>Zwerg Nase (reply) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:* '''Note''': The article is also a nominee for ITN. If that succeeds, this nomination has to be withdrawn per [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria|eligibility criteria 1.e]]. §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|<font color="#E0115F"><i><b>Dharmadhyaksha</b></i></font>]]§§ <small>{[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|Edits]]}</small> 05:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | :* '''Note''': The article is also a nominee for ITN. If that succeeds, this nomination has to be withdrawn per [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria|eligibility criteria 1.e]]. §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|<font color="#E0115F"><i><b>Dharmadhyaksha</b></i></font>]]§§ <small>{[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|Edits]]}</small> 05:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::{{reply|Dharmadhyaksha}} I pulled the ITN nomination since no-one was interested in that anyway. So this is good to go in terms of reviewing. [[User:Zwerg Nase|Zwerg Nase]] ([[User talk:Zwerg Nase|talk]]) 20:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 21 March 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2016 Milan–San Remo
- ... that the 2016 edition of Milan–San Remo needed to take a 9 km (5.6 mi) detour due to a landslide blocking the original route?
5x expanded by Zwerg Nase (talk). Self-nominated at 18:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC).
- Note: The article is also a nominee for ITN. If that succeeds, this nomination has to be withdrawn per eligibility criteria 1.e. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Reply I pulled the ITN nomination since no-one was interested in that anyway. So this is good to go in terms of reviewing. Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
