Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Spinningspark
(Hook does not accurately reflect the article)
imported>Andrew Gray
(cmt)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]Length, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters".  It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses.  If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark'''</font>]]''' 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]Length, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters".  It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses.  If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark'''</font>]]''' 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 
+
::*The two numbers are both given by the source, and I don't think it's much of OR to conclude that they're approximately in a 3:1 ratio. I'll have a think about this. [[User:Andrew Gray|Andrew Gray]] ([[User talk:Andrew Gray|talk]]) 09:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:41, 12 February 2013

66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division

5x expanded by Andrew Gray (talk). Self nom at 10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svgLength, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters". It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses. If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. SpinningSpark 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
  • The two numbers are both given by the source, and I don't think it's much of OR to conclude that they're approximately in a 3:1 ratio. I'll have a think about this. Andrew Gray (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)