Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Abelsonite"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>EdChem
(ce)
imported>EdChem
(expand)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
*{{DYKmake|Abelsonite|Chris857}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Abelsonite|Chris857}}
 
-->
 
-->
 
:*''Reviewed'':
 
  
 
:''Article Issues''
 
:''Article Issues''
Line 34: Line 32:
 
::I would be interested in the submitter's thoughts on linking to [[chlorophyll a]] rather than [[chlorophyll]].
 
::I would be interested in the submitter's thoughts on linking to [[chlorophyll a]] rather than [[chlorophyll]].
 
:*Hook neutrality is not a problem.
 
:*Hook neutrality is not a problem.
:I will return and check copyvio and referencing issues later, hopefully after the submitter has added a reference for the original hook.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 11:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
+
:''QPQ reviewing requirement''
 +
:*Chris857's user page claims over 5 DYK credits, so this requirement applies.  Chris857 did do a [[Template:Did you know nominations/Chinchaga fire|DYK review for ''chinchaga fire'']].  Vensatry  also claimed credit for this same review [[Template:Did you know nominations/List of international cricket centuries by Garfield Sobers|here]].  I don't know whether this is acceptable - for two editors to both be credited for a review - but I would credit Chris857's claim to the review over Vensatry's both for comprehensiveness and accuracy.
 +
:''Other thoughts''
 +
:I will return and check copyvio and referencing issues later, hopefully after Chris has added a reference for the original hook.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 11:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:55, 7 January 2013

Abelsonite

5x expanded by Chris857 (talk). Self nom at 03:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Article Issues
  • Expansion is 2179/256 = 8.51... > 5x as required.
  • Expansion occurred on 7 January 2012, so date requirements satisfied.
  • Policy - neutrality and citations are fine. Copyvio check to follow.
Hook Issues
  • Sentence supporting original hook is uncited, but may be in the reference from the sentence following.
  • Sentence supporting ALT1 is cited. Reference check to follow.
  • Hook length is fine
  • As a chemist, I find ALT1 more interesting - when thinking of substances leading to minerals, chlorophyll does not strike me as a common source. That a mineral is only found in one area strikes me more as a "So what?" kind of fact. The material in the article about geoporphyrins makes me wonder if a better hook (by combining with ALT1) might be:
ALT2: ... that the mineral abelsonite probably formed from chlorophyll and is the only known crystalline geoporphyrin?
I would be interested in the submitter's thoughts on linking to chlorophyll a rather than chlorophyll.
  • Hook neutrality is not a problem.
QPQ reviewing requirement
  • Chris857's user page claims over 5 DYK credits, so this requirement applies. Chris857 did do a DYK review for chinchaga fire. Vensatry also claimed credit for this same review here. I don't know whether this is acceptable - for two editors to both be credited for a review - but I would credit Chris857's claim to the review over Vensatry's both for comprehensiveness and accuracy.
Other thoughts
I will return and check copyvio and referencing issues later, hopefully after Chris has added a reference for the original hook. EdChem (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)