Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acanthurus dussumieri"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Muhandes
(ready to go, added an image)
imported>Muhandes
(not needed)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Acanthurus dussumieri|Acanthurus dussumieri}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Acanthurus dussumieri|Acanthurus dussumieri}}
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
{{main page image|image=Acanthurus dussumieri 1.jpg|caption=Adult ornate surgeonfish|width=133x150}}
+
{{main page image|image=Acanthurus dussumieri 1.jpg|caption=Adult ornate surgeonfish}}
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!--
 
<!--

Revision as of 13:27, 13 January 2020

Acanthurus dussumieri

Adult ornate surgeonfish
Adult ornate surgeonfish
  • ... that juvenile ornate surgeonfish are quite different in colouring from the adult fish (pictured)?
    • ALT1:... that juvenile ornate surgeonfish are quite different in appearance from the adult fish (pictured)?

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg The article is long enough and 5x expansion is verified and new enough. The article includes citations to reliable sources (well, one reliable source) for each paragraph. It seems neutral and I could not detect any signs of plagiarism. The hook is interesting enough and short enough. As for its source, it is in French and while I could not find a sentence where it says specifically that juveniles are "different", it does list Template:Tq in a separate section for Template:Tq, so it quite obviously considers them different. So, in a mix of AGF and common sense, I consider it sourced. Although some shape difference is also mentioned Template:Tq, there is no mention that this is significant, so I think the original hook is better and more accurate than ALT1. QPQ done, so this is ready to go. I added an image from the commons. It is free, used in the article and clear at 100px, so I see no reason not to include it. --Muhandes (talk) 13:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)