Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acanthurus dussumieri"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Muhandes (not needed) |
imported>Muhandes (I believe it is called ALT0) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] The article is long enough and 5x expansion is verified and new enough. The article includes citations to reliable sources (well, one reliable source) for each paragraph. It seems neutral and I could not detect any signs of plagiarism. The hook is interesting enough and short enough. As for its source, it is in French and while I could not find a sentence where it says specifically that juveniles are "different", it does list {{tq|Le patron de couleurs des juvéniles|q=yes}} in a separate section for {{tq|Description du juvénile|Q=yes}}, so it quite obviously considers them different. So, in a mix of AGF and common sense, I consider it sourced. Although some shape difference is also mentioned {{tq|Le corps du juvénile dessine un ovale proportionnellement moins long et plus haut que celui des adultes.|q=yes}}, there is no mention that this is significant, so I think | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] The article is long enough and 5x expansion is verified and new enough. The article includes citations to reliable sources (well, one reliable source) for each paragraph. It seems neutral and I could not detect any signs of plagiarism. The hook is interesting enough and short enough. As for its source, it is in French and while I could not find a sentence where it says specifically that juveniles are "different", it does list {{tq|Le patron de couleurs des juvéniles|q=yes}} in a separate section for {{tq|Description du juvénile|Q=yes}}, so it quite obviously considers them different. So, in a mix of AGF and common sense, I consider it sourced. Although some shape difference is also mentioned {{tq|Le corps du juvénile dessine un ovale proportionnellement moins long et plus haut que celui des adultes.|q=yes}}, there is no mention that this is significant, so I think ALT0 is better and more accurate than ALT1. QPQ done, so this is ready to go. I added an image from the commons. It is free, used in the article and clear at 100px, so I see no reason not to include it. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 13:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 22:07, 13 January 2020
DYK toolbox |
---|
Acanthurus dussumieri
- ... that juvenile ornate surgeonfish are quite different in colouring from the adult fish (pictured)?
- ALT1:... that juvenile ornate surgeonfish are quite different in appearance from the adult fish (pictured)?
- Reviewed: BorderIrish
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC).
The article is long enough and 5x expansion is verified and new enough. The article includes citations to reliable sources (well, one reliable source) for each paragraph. It seems neutral and I could not detect any signs of plagiarism. The hook is interesting enough and short enough. As for its source, it is in French and while I could not find a sentence where it says specifically that juveniles are "different", it does list Template:Tq in a separate section for Template:Tq, so it quite obviously considers them different. So, in a mix of AGF and common sense, I consider it sourced. Although some shape difference is also mentioned Template:Tq, there is no mention that this is significant, so I think ALT0 is better and more accurate than ALT1. QPQ done, so this is ready to go. I added an image from the commons. It is free, used in the article and clear at 100px, so I see no reason not to include it. --Muhandes (talk) 13:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)