Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Agastachys"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (Hence for ''Persoonia gunnii'', it lists its whole range - which is wholly in tasmania (and nowhere else)) |
imported>Casliber m (replied) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, [http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/online-resources/flora/stddisplay.xsql?pnid=46093 Banksia dentata] extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | :Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, [http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/online-resources/flora/stddisplay.xsql?pnid=46093 Banksia dentata] extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :Hence for ''Persoonia gunnii'', it lists | + | :Hence for ''Persoonia gunnii'' and ''Persoonia muelleri'', it lists their whole range - which is wholly in tasmania (and nowhere else) [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 03:20, 25 September 2012
Agastachys, Persoonia gunnii, Persoonia muelleri
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Agastachys
- Persoonia gunnii
- Persoonia muelleri )
- ... that the white waratah, mountain and Mueller's geebungs are three members of the protea family found only in Tasmania?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rufe Persful, Template:Did you know nominations/Walthamstow by-election, 1897, Template:Did you know nominations/Janabiyah
- Comment: just thought the names were funny enough sounding to make it interesting....
Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Wriekhathaar (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 14:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Summary:
- 1st: new article, 1507 characters; hook fact needs an inline citation
- 2nd: expansion, 361*5=1801 needed, at 1836; source says it's present, but not explicitly endemic to Tasmania
- 3rd: expansion, 50*5=1500 needed, now at 1646; same issue as #2.
Does the Flora of Australia Online website implicitly only include species that are endemic to Australia. If yes, is this sufficient to count as proof of endemicity? Not sure ... Sasata (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, Banksia dentata extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)