Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Alma Levant Hayden"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Graeme Bartlett
(good to go)
imported>Graeme Bartlett
(6th)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:::: * I've also done a QPQ review and added it to the template, but it doesn't appear to be showing - can't figure out why (sorry). [[User:Hildabast|Hildabast]] ([[User talk:Hildabast|talk]]) 15:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::: * I've also done a QPQ review and added it to the template, but it doesn't appear to be showing - can't figure out why (sorry). [[User:Hildabast|Hildabast]] ([[User talk:Hildabast|talk]]) 15:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#My_Brother.27s_Husband|My Brother's Husband]]  [[User:Hildabast|Hildabast]] ([[User talk:Hildabast|talk]]) 15:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#My_Brother.27s_Husband|My Brother's Husband]]  [[User:Hildabast|Hildabast]] ([[User talk:Hildabast|talk]]) 15:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Confirming QPQ review done at [[Template:Did you know nominations/My Brother's Husband]]. Also given the above, this is good to go. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
+
::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Confirming QPQ review done at [[Template:Did you know nominations/My Brother's Husband]]. (this appears to be a sixth DYK) Also given the above, this is good to go. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:06, 26 May 2017

Alma Levant Hayden

Alma L. Hayden spraying reagent, 1952
Alma L. Hayden spraying reagent, 1952

Created by Hildabast (talk). Self-nominated at 22:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Checked for absence of copyright violation. Article is new and big enough. Correct person credited. Article is cited throughout and neutrally written. One anachronistic euphemism does not disqualify the DYK. Hook below (alt1) is cited and sounds to be confirmed by newspapers, although I will give an AGF as the page does not open with enough resolution to read the detail. The image is public domain (confirmed on flickr too) and used and looks OK.I would prefer that hooks do not have uncertain facts in them. So how about leaving out the "may have been" bit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Placing the ? so Hildabast and someone else can support alt1. Otherwise this is good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
* I've also done a QPQ review and added it to the template, but it doesn't appear to be showing - can't figure out why (sorry). Hildabast (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)