Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Animal transportation"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(hook "goats" and "singing" not found in article; otherwise, needs more sourcing)
imported>Ansh666
(cmt)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
:::"History" section is only sourced in the first paragraph
 
:::"History" section is only sourced in the first paragraph
 
:::"Seals" section has "citation needed" at the end.  [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:::"Seals" section has "citation needed" at the end.  [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 +
::*As [[goat]]s count as [[livestock]], the relevant article would be [[livestock transportation]] (which also doesn't contain anything specifically about goats or singing). Also, a side note, [[Animal transportation]] is in a move discussion, with current consensus being to move to [[Transportation of animals]] and to create a disambig page at the current location. [[User:Ansh666|Ansh]]''[[User talk:Ansh666|666]]'' 17:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 17:59, 10 July 2013

Animal transportation

Created by Seal Boxer (talk). Self nominated at 13:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC).

  • There's no article. If there were, and the DYK hook was adequately sourced in the article, I think it would be a keeper, except I'd change the archaic "whilst" to "while" in accordance with style guidelines on both sides of the Atlantic. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg There are a few completely unsourced or inadequately sourced paragraphs. The style should certainly be improved. I am not sure if the hook source qualifies as reliable, being self-published. The hook, however, would be excellent. Surtsicna (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg There have been significant changes to the article over the past week and a half. Can a reviewer see whether the issues raised by Surtsicna remain while doing a full review of the article as it currently stands, notably the hook sourcing? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Re the hook - I don't see anything in the article about goats or singing.
"History" section is only sourced in the first paragraph
"Seals" section has "citation needed" at the end. — Maile (talk) 21:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)