Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Muslim pogroms in India"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Future Perfect at Sunrise
(massive POV problems)
imported>Titodutta
(re)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
* There are some massive POV problems in this article, beginning with the first sentence, which contains a blatant piece of source misrepresentation [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anti-Muslim_pogroms_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=558720406]. It should never go on DYK unless significantly cleaned up. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 07:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 
* There are some massive POV problems in this article, beginning with the first sentence, which contains a blatant piece of source misrepresentation [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anti-Muslim_pogroms_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=558720406]. It should never go on DYK unless significantly cleaned up. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 07:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 +
* '''Other issues''' a) the linked [[Gyanendra Pandey]] in the hook is a cricketer! b) the mentioned source states ''Since 1950, Hindu-Muslim violence has claimed more than 10,000 lives. A systematic causal analysis of these events becomes a challenge in the absence of reliable data, assuming that government data tends to be biased.'' — So, sourcing unclear! --[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]]&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Titodutta|contributions]] • [[Special:EmailUser/Titodutta|email]]) 07:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:35, 7 June 2013

Anti-Muslim pogroms in India

  • Reviewed: If you reviewed another article before listing this DYK nomination, put it here. Otherwise leave this line alone; it will blank when saved.

Created/expanded by Darkness Shines (talk). Self nominated at 16:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Long enough, new, expanded. Has neutral point of view. I think it should go ahead. Faizan 04:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Interesting to know that you specifically pointed out "Has neutral point of view" when you were quite aware of all the NPOV issues with this article that were being discussed at various venues. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) double edit conflict Whoosh! Was going to say exactly the same thing— the article has maintenance tags which need to be solved! --Tito Dutta  (talkcontributionsemail) 14:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
  • There are some massive POV problems in this article, beginning with the first sentence, which contains a blatant piece of source misrepresentation [1]. It should never go on DYK unless significantly cleaned up. Fut.Perf. 07:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Other issues a) the linked Gyanendra Pandey in the hook is a cricketer! b) the mentioned source states Since 1950, Hindu-Muslim violence has claimed more than 10,000 lives. A systematic causal analysis of these events becomes a challenge in the absence of reliable data, assuming that government data tends to be biased. — So, sourcing unclear! --Tito Dutta  (talkcontributionsemail) 07:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC)