Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Darkness Shines (Good to go) |
imported>BlueMoonset (more review detail needed) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. (Note: original hook is 197 characters; initial "... " is not counted. While technically not over 200 characters, though, it is unnecessarily long.) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. (Note: original hook is 197 characters; initial "... " is not counted. While technically not over 200 characters, though, it is unnecessarily long.) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go with ALT two, ref four has an embedded quote which verifies the hook. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 19:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | * [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go with ALT two, ref four has an embedded quote which verifies the hook. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 19:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] "Good to go" is not sufficient; more explanation is needed, especially in light of the issues found with another brief review at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Fermanagh Mallards F.C.]]. Please detail what was checked, including length, newness, neutrality (especially important in an article about a pogrom), sourcing in the article as a whole, close paraphrasing, etc. (There's a "better source needed" template in the article that should at least have been addressed.) Reviews should always touch on all the facets that were checked, so hook promoters can get a sense of the work that was done. Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 01:38, 2 January 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo
- ... that after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo, where two died and massive damage was done to Serb-owned houses, schools and other institutions?
- Comment: Well-documented incident, linked to historically significant events in 1914.
Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Nominated by Anonimski (talk) at 09:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC).
- ALT1... that after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo, where two died and massive damage was done to Serb-owned houses, schools and other institutions?
- --Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- What about
- ALT2 ... that following the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo (pictured)? --Zoupan 18:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- I am fine with it.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. (Note: original hook is 197 characters; initial "... " is not counted. While technically not over 200 characters, though, it is unnecessarily long.) BlueMoonset (talk) 17:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Good to go with ALT two, ref four has an embedded quote which verifies the hook. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
"Good to go" is not sufficient; more explanation is needed, especially in light of the issues found with another brief review at Template:Did you know nominations/Fermanagh Mallards F.C.. Please detail what was checked, including length, newness, neutrality (especially important in an article about a pogrom), sourcing in the article as a whole, close paraphrasing, etc. (There's a "better source needed" template in the article that should at least have been addressed.) Reviews should always touch on all the facets that were checked, so hook promoters can get a sense of the work that was done. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
