Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Atmabodha Upanishad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ceradon (to prep 1) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | ||
− | The result was: '''promoted''' by '''[[User:Ceradon|ceradon]]''' ([[User talk:Ceradon|< | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by '''[[User:Ceradon|ceradon]]''' ([[User talk:Ceradon|<span style="color:#036;">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ceradon|<span style="color:#036;">contribs</span>]]) 14:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Atmabodha Upanishad==== | ====Atmabodha Upanishad==== | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* '''ALT1''': ... the '''''[[Atmabodha Upanishad]]''''' explains "state of knowledge of the inner self"? | * '''ALT1''': ... the '''''[[Atmabodha Upanishad]]''''' explains "state of knowledge of the inner self"? | ||
* '''ALT2''': ... the '''''[[Atmabodha Upanishad]]''''' speaks on the "Absolute Reality"? | * '''ALT2''': ... the '''''[[Atmabodha Upanishad]]''''' speaks on the "Absolute Reality"? | ||
− | : [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]], thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.[[User:Redtigerxyz|< | + | : [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]], thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.[[User:Redtigerxyz|<span style="color:red;">Redtigerxyz</span>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC) |
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) | ||
− | :: Thanks [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]]. Linked Samanya in lead which explains the meaning.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|< | + | :: Thanks [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]]. Linked Samanya in lead which explains the meaning.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|<span style="color:red;">Redtigerxyz</span>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC) |
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 02:37, 8 July 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by ceradon (talk • contribs) 14:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Atmabodha Upanishad
- .
.. that Vishnu's (pictured) attributes the conch, chakra and mace are mentioned in the Atmabodha Upanishad, which denote Akasha (ether), Manas (mind) and Buddhi (intelligence)?
Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 09:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC).
- I've fixed the DN's in the hook. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Ping Unless I'm seriously misreading it, the claim in the hook is not contained in the reference it links to. That reference only mentions Akasha and Buḍḍhi in a footnote without defining them, only Manas is actually defined. I'm not doubting they are correct, we just need another source. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... the Atmabodha Upanishad explains "state of knowledge of the inner self"?
- ALT2: ... the Atmabodha Upanishad speaks on the "Absolute Reality"?
- Maury Markowitz, thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.Redtigerxyz Talk 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. Maury Markowitz (talk)
- Thanks Maury Markowitz. Linked Samanya in lead which explains the meaning.--Redtigerxyz Talk 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)