Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martinevans123
(apols)
imported>EEng
(Excelsior)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
Fine with me. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed {{u|Martinevans123}} hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))
 
Fine with me. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed {{u|Martinevans123}} hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))
 
:I couldn't possibly [[Queening|lower myself]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:I couldn't possibly [[Queening|lower myself]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 +
::Nonetheless you have. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:09, 23 December 2014

Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014

  • Reviewed: Did you know nominations/Hans Krueger
  • Comment: Okay, I'm aware that we're typically squeamish about sex-related topics on the main page, but I honestly can't think of any reason not to add this; the key topic when discussing the regulations is censorship, not pornography in itself, and the article passes all of the normal criteria.

Created by Sceptre (talk). Self nominated at 04:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Secondary comment: there's also the related article Charlotte Rose, which is about twenty days old and could provide the basis for a double hook; I've asked that article's creator, ISD (talk⧼dot-separator⧽contribs), if he'd like to contribute to the discussion. Sceptre (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Perhaps we should go with a hook that's less in-your-face:
ALT2... that a Parliament Square protest against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?

(It's in the Telegraph article.) EEng (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Template:U: I feel there's an opportunity here re urine and streaming, but the words just aren't flowing. Can you help out? (Nothing too ham-handed, please, and no yellow journalism etc.)

ALT2a: ... that sex worker Charlotte Rose organised a protest in Parliament Square against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos, which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. Sceptre (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Fine with me. EEng (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed Template:U hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. EEng (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))

I couldn't possibly lower myself. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Nonetheless you have. EEng (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)