Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>EEng (Excelsior) |
imported>Martinevans123 (Millis Vindaloo, anyone?) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:I couldn't possibly [[Queening|lower myself]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | :I couldn't possibly [[Queening|lower myself]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Nonetheless you have. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | ::Nonetheless you have. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::I refuse to [[Curry's paradox|reply]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 20:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 20:55, 23 December 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014
- ... that the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 resulted in a mass facesitting demonstration in Parliament Square against the regulations?
- Reviewed: Did you know nominations/Hans Krueger
- Comment: Okay, I'm aware that we're typically squeamish about sex-related topics on the main page, but I honestly can't think of any reason not to add this; the key topic when discussing the regulations is censorship, not pornography in itself, and the article passes all of the normal criteria.
Created by Sceptre (talk). Self nominated at 04:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC).
- Secondary comment: there's also the related article Charlotte Rose, which is about twenty days old and could provide the basis for a double hook; I've asked that article's creator, ISD (talk⧼dot-separator⧽contribs), if he'd like to contribute to the discussion. Sceptre (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Reply to above: Possible suggestion combining both articles - ALT1 ... that in protest to the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 sex worker Charlotte Rose organised a mass facesitting demonstration in Parliament Square? ISD (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should go with a hook that's less in-your-face:
- ALT2... that a Parliament Square protest against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
(It's in the Telegraph article.) EEng (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Template:U: I feel there's an opportunity here re urine and streaming, but the words just aren't flowing. Can you help out? (Nothing too ham-handed, please, and no yellow journalism etc.)
- ALT2a: ... that sex worker Charlotte Rose organised a protest in Parliament Square against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos, which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
- That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. Sceptre (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Fine with me. EEng (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed Template:U hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. EEng (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))
- I couldn't possibly lower myself. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nonetheless you have. EEng (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- I refuse to reply. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nonetheless you have. EEng (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)