Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Bantha"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(DYK review must be by someone other than the GA reviewer, so new reviewer needed)
imported>Moonraker
(Reviewed)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
:**Thanks {{U|J Milburn}}. Yes, the original alt was missing the phrase "was portrayed by an elephant", which was of course a very bad omission. LOL But I'm fine with ALT2 per your suggestion. — [[User:Hunter Kahn|<b style="color:#C0C0C0">Hunter</b>]] [[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<b style="color:#595454">Kahn</b>]] 17:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:**Thanks {{U|J Milburn}}. Yes, the original alt was missing the phrase "was portrayed by an elephant", which was of course a very bad omission. LOL But I'm fine with ALT2 per your suggestion. — [[User:Hunter Kahn|<b style="color:#C0C0C0">Hunter</b>]] [[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<b style="color:#595454">Kahn</b>]] 17:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]], regrettably, you are not an eligible reviewer for this nomination, since you were the reviewer at GAN per [[WP:DYKSG#H2]]: {{tq|You're not allowed to approve your own hook or article, nor may you review an article if it's a recently listed Good Article that you either nominated or reviewed for GA (though you can still nominate it for DYK).}} The idea is that a new reviewer might spot something that the original reviewer might have overlooked in their review (and indeed this has happened in the past). So we're going to need a fresh review by someone not involved with the GA review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]], regrettably, you are not an eligible reviewer for this nomination, since you were the reviewer at GAN per [[WP:DYKSG#H2]]: {{tq|You're not allowed to approve your own hook or article, nor may you review an article if it's a recently listed Good Article that you either nominated or reviewed for GA (though you can still nominate it for DYK).}} The idea is that a new reviewer might spot something that the original reviewer might have overlooked in their review (and indeed this has happened in the past). So we're going to need a fresh review by someone not involved with the GA review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 +
 +
[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] for the main hook, as the online source says only that the elephant kept shrugging off the costume. It would be okay without the last five words, or perhaps {{u|Hunter Kahn}} can say exactly where they are from? ALT1 falls foul of [[WP:DYKSG#C6|Rule C6]]. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] for ALT2 and ALT3. Article meets the requirements and is recently promoted to GA status, Earwig has no concerns, QPQ done. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 05:49, 19 April 2020

Bantha

Improved to Good Article status by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self-nominated at 03:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg for ALT1, ALT2; Symbol voting keep.svg for ALT2 ALT3; Symbol possible vote.svg for the original hook, as it seems to be missing something. Article is high-quality and recently promoted to GA status. Hooks check out (with the exception of the original). Alt2 is my favourite, as I think it'll appeal to the most readers/lead to the most clicks. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
    • Thanks Template:U. Yes, the original alt was missing the phrase "was portrayed by an elephant", which was of course a very bad omission. LOL But I'm fine with ALT2 per your suggestion. — Hunter Kahn 17:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Josh Milburn, regrettably, you are not an eligible reviewer for this nomination, since you were the reviewer at GAN per WP:DYKSG#H2: Template:Tq The idea is that a new reviewer might spot something that the original reviewer might have overlooked in their review (and indeed this has happened in the past). So we're going to need a fresh review by someone not involved with the GA review. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg for the main hook, as the online source says only that the elephant kept shrugging off the costume. It would be okay without the last five words, or perhaps Template:U can say exactly where they are from? ALT1 falls foul of Rule C6. Symbol confirmed.svg for ALT2 and ALT3. Article meets the requirements and is recently promoted to GA status, Earwig has no concerns, QPQ done. Moonraker (talk) 05:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)