Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Barbara Newman"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mary Mark Ockerbloom
imported>Yoninah
(add sig)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
* thanks for having a look! I'm trying to find some controversy, but it's surprisingly hard -- I guess if she were a theologian it would be different. There was a conference she organized a few years back on Goddesses that might've had some controversy. Anyhow, yes, I'd love to have this be a part of women's history month if I can get it approved. [[User:Altenmaeren|Altenmaeren]] ([[User talk:Altenmaeren|talk]]) 19:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 
* thanks for having a look! I'm trying to find some controversy, but it's surprisingly hard -- I guess if she were a theologian it would be different. There was a conference she organized a few years back on Goddesses that might've had some controversy. Anyhow, yes, I'd love to have this be a part of women's history month if I can get it approved. [[User:Altenmaeren|Altenmaeren]] ([[User talk:Altenmaeren|talk]]) 19:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  Striving for balance doesn't mean we have to manufacture a negative -- I've spent the last hour or so searching for info on her, and have come up with lots of references to her work in published books, but nothing controversial.  She's highly thought off and heavily referenced in her field (search Google with the "More...Books" option).  Long enough, new enough, referenced (though the existing references could be improved by giving fuller citations); quotations are used appropriately, no copyvios, hook is okay, but not exciting -- here's an alt (I added an idea from the review cited to support this one).
 
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  Striving for balance doesn't mean we have to manufacture a negative -- I've spent the last hour or so searching for info on her, and have come up with lots of references to her work in published books, but nothing controversial.  She's highly thought off and heavily referenced in her field (search Google with the "More...Books" option).  Long enough, new enough, referenced (though the existing references could be improved by giving fuller citations); quotations are used appropriately, no copyvios, hook is okay, but not exciting -- here's an alt (I added an idea from the review cited to support this one).
:::* '''ALT2''': ... that medieval scholar '''[[Barbara Newman]]''' suggests that female "creations of the Christian imagination" deepened the medieval vision of God?
+
:::* '''ALT2''': ... that medieval scholar '''[[Barbara Newman]]''' suggests that female "creations of the Christian imagination" deepened the medieval vision of God? [[User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom|Mary Mark Ockerbloom]] ([[User talk:Mary Mark Ockerbloom|talk]]) 22:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:21, 5 March 2015

Barbara Newman

Created by Altenmaeren (talk). Self nominated at 12:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Can we improve the balance in this article. She seems to be a brilliant person with a brilliant book. Is there not someone who doesn't agree with this religious historian (or does she not tackle controversy?) :-) Oh and can it be used for Womens History Month when approved? Victuallers (talk) 00:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • thanks for having a look! I'm trying to find some controversy, but it's surprisingly hard -- I guess if she were a theologian it would be different. There was a conference she organized a few years back on Goddesses that might've had some controversy. Anyhow, yes, I'd love to have this be a part of women's history month if I can get it approved. Altenmaeren (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Striving for balance doesn't mean we have to manufacture a negative -- I've spent the last hour or so searching for info on her, and have come up with lots of references to her work in published books, but nothing controversial. She's highly thought off and heavily referenced in her field (search Google with the "More...Books" option). Long enough, new enough, referenced (though the existing references could be improved by giving fuller citations); quotations are used appropriately, no copyvios, hook is okay, but not exciting -- here's an alt (I added an idea from the review cited to support this one).
  • ALT2: ... that medieval scholar Barbara Newman suggests that female "creations of the Christian imagination" deepened the medieval vision of God? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)