Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Berberis koreana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Orlady (followup review; suggesting a new ALT; needs fresh eyes) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | {{*mp}}... that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects? | + | {{*mp}}... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :*'''ALT1''':... that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is delicious and intoxicating? | + | :*'''ALT1''':... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is delicious and intoxicating? |
− | :*'''ALT2''':... that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects? | + | :*'''ALT2''':... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects? |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Max Charles|Max Charles]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Max Charles|Max Charles]] | ||
:*''Comment'': Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's? | :*''Comment'': Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's? | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]hook length and facts check. Article newness and length are good. Not sure about the reliability of the "Plants for the Future" website though.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 04:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]hook length and facts check. Article newness and length are good. Not sure about the reliability of the "Plants for the Future" website though.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 04:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
:* I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach [[WP:MEDRS]]. [[Special:Contributions/86.139.213.143|86.139.213.143]] ([[User talk:86.139.213.143|talk]]) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | :* I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach [[WP:MEDRS]]. [[Special:Contributions/86.139.213.143|86.139.213.143]] ([[User talk:86.139.213.143|talk]]) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3? | |
+ | :::*ALT3 ... that extracts from '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 16:03, 23 July 2012
Berberis koreana
- ...
that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
- ALT1:...
that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is delicious and intoxicating?
- ALT2:...
that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
- Reviewed: Max Charles
- Comment: Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's?
- ALT1:...
Created/expanded by Katewright54 (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 16:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
hook length and facts check. Article newness and length are good. Not sure about the reliability of the "Plants for the Future" website though.--Kevmin § 04:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach WP:MEDRS. 86.139.213.143 (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3?
- ALT3 ... that extracts from Korean Barberry (pictured) might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --Orlady (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)