Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Berberis koreana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Orlady (followup review; suggesting a new ALT; needs fresh eyes) |
imported>Orlady (edited my hook) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:* I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach [[WP:MEDRS]]. [[Special:Contributions/86.139.213.143|86.139.213.143]] ([[User talk:86.139.213.143|talk]]) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | :* I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach [[WP:MEDRS]]. [[Special:Contributions/86.139.213.143|86.139.213.143]] ([[User talk:86.139.213.143|talk]]) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3? | ::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3? | ||
− | :::*ALT3 ... that | + | :::*'''ALT3''' ... that chemicals in '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 16:04, 23 July 2012
Berberis koreana
- ...
that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
- ALT1:...
that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is delicious and intoxicating?
- ALT2:...
that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
- Reviewed: Max Charles
- Comment: Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's?
- ALT1:...
Created/expanded by Katewright54 (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 16:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
hook length and facts check. Article newness and length are good. Not sure about the reliability of the "Plants for the Future" website though.--Kevmin § 04:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach WP:MEDRS. 86.139.213.143 (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3?
- ALT3 ... that chemicals in Korean Barberry (pictured) might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --Orlady (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)