Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Berberis koreana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Orlady (edited my hook) |
imported>George Ho (struck out my hooks; favoring ALT3) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | {{*mp}}... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects? | + | <s>{{*mp}}... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?</s> |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :*'''ALT1''':... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is delicious and intoxicating? | + | :<s>*'''ALT1''':... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is delicious and intoxicating? |
− | :*'''ALT2''':... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects? | + | :*'''ALT2''':... [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] that a '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?</s> |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Max Charles|Max Charles]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Max Charles|Max Charles]] | ||
:*''Comment'': Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's? | :*''Comment'': Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's? | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3? | ::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3? | ||
:::*'''ALT3''' ... that chemicals in '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | :::*'''ALT3''' ... that chemicals in '''[[Berberis koreana|Korean Barberry]]''' ''(pictured)'' might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | [[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] I'm fine with ALT3 if it's verified properly; also, I scrapped out my hooks. Let's wait for a reviewer. By the way, how can a bot credit Orlady? --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 18:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 18:52, 23 July 2012
Berberis koreana
...that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
*ALT1:...that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is delicious and intoxicating?
ALT2:...that a Korean Barberry (pictured) is used for medicine and food with severe but non-threatening digestive side effects?
- Reviewed: Max Charles
- Comment: Not a self-nom. ALT1 might be good for April Fool's?
Created/expanded by Katewright54 (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 16:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
hook length and facts check. Article newness and length are good. Not sure about the reliability of the "Plants for the Future" website though.--Kevmin § 04:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not quite convinced the sources for the medical claims reach WP:MEDRS. 86.139.213.143 (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I made several edits to the article, including adding a sourced statement that there are no established medical uses. I think the resulting article is OK w/r/t MEDRS. However, I don't like any of the hooks, as worded. It stretches the sourcing to say it is "used for medicine"; the article does not suggest it is delicious; the word "intoxicating" is misleading as it implies an effect like alcoholic beverages but in fact means "toxic"; and the words "not life threatening" do not equate to "non-threatening". How about trying ALT3?
- ALT3 ... that chemicals in Korean Barberry (pictured) might have antibacterial and antitumor properties? --Orlady (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm fine with ALT3 if it's verified properly; also, I scrapped out my hooks. Let's wait for a reviewer. By the way, how can a bot credit Orlady? --George Ho (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)