Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Storye book
m (typo)
imported>Skr15081997
(promoted to prep 3.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Skr15081997|Skr15081997]] ([[User talk:Skr15081997|talk]]) 16:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden====
 
====Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden|Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden|Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the '''[[Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden]]''' in [[Beverly Hills, California]] was dedicated on September 11, 2011 to honor the victims of the [[September 11 attacks]] of 2001?
 
* ... that the '''[[Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden]]''' in [[Beverly Hills, California]] was dedicated on September 11, 2011 to honor the victims of the [[September 11 attacks]] of 2001?
 
* '''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden]]''' was dedicated exactly ten years after the [[September 11 attacks]] of 2001?
 
* '''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden]]''' was dedicated exactly ten years after the [[September 11 attacks]] of 2001?
 
* '''ALT2''' ... that the '''[[Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden]]''' is centered around a 30-foot bent steel beam from the wreckage of the [[World Trade Center]]?
 
* '''ALT2''' ... that the '''[[Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden]]''' is centered around a 30-foot bent steel beam from the wreckage of the [[World Trade Center]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created by [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]). Self nominated at 15:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]). Self nominated at 15:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden|Zigzig20s}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough. Long enough. NPOV. Duplication Detector shows no unavoidable close paraphrasing or copyivos when checking the main online sources. Hook is cited and the article is well-cited generally. But, the hook seems verbose and unremarkable, so I've added two ALTs. I prefer ALT2. No QPQ done. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough. Long enough. NPOV. Duplication Detector shows no unavoidable close paraphrasing or copyivos when checking the main online sources. Hook is cited and the article is well-cited generally. But, the hook seems verbose and unremarkable, so I've added two ALTs. I prefer ALT2. No QPQ done. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 
::*Sure, either one works. [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 
::*Sure, either one works. [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:::* Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:::* Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. [[Template:Did you know nominations/John C. McManus|this one]]). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above review taken on trust. Good to go. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
+
::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. [[Template:Did you know nominations/John C. McManus|this one]]). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above review taken on trust. Good to go. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 16:32, 3 July 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Skr15081997 (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden

Created by Zigzig20s (talk). Self nominated at 15:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough. Long enough. NPOV. Duplication Detector shows no unavoidable close paraphrasing or copyivos when checking the main online sources. Hook is cited and the article is well-cited generally. But, the hook seems verbose and unremarkable, so I've added two ALTs. I prefer ALT2. No QPQ done. Edwardx (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Sure, either one works. Zigzig20s (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... Edwardx (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. this one). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above review taken on trust. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)