Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Black grasswren"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (←Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Black grasswren | article2 = | status = expanded | hook = ... that although the '''black...') |
imported>Drchriswilliams (Good to go) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
* ... that although the '''[[black grasswren]]''' was discovered in 1901, it was not seen again until 1968? <small>source: [http://www.publish.csiro.au/mu/pdf/MU970193]</small> | * ... that although the '''[[black grasswren]]''' was discovered in 1901, it was not seen again until 1968? <small>source: [http://www.publish.csiro.au/mu/pdf/MU970193]</small> | ||
− | ** '''ALT1''':...that although the '''[[black grasswren]]''' was discovered in 1901, its nesting habits remained unknown till 1998<small>Source: [http://museum.wa.gov.au/research/records-supplements/records/first-description-nest-and-eggs-black-grasswren-amytornis-house]</small> | + | ** '''ALT1''':...that although the '''[[black grasswren]]''' was discovered in 1901, its nesting habits remained unknown till 1998? <small>Source: [http://museum.wa.gov.au/research/records-supplements/records/first-description-nest-and-eggs-black-grasswren-amytornis-house]</small> |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Ayodele Casel]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Ayodele Casel]] | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Self-nominated at 14:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Self-nominated at 14:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article was created in 2007 and has been recently expanded. The sequence of edits made between 15 and 17 October increased the prose of the main text by x5. There are no outstanding maintenance issues affecting the article. There are five good-quality sources used, these are distributed across the article. Checking against the sources used there is no copyright violation or close violation apparent, although I note one source is a book where there is no link to check this online and good faith is assumed. There is no image included in this nomination. QPQ has been declared. The text within the article is written in a neutral tone and appears policy compliant. The hooks suggested are short-enough, neutral and interesting. Both hooks have appropriate citations. I find ALT1 more interesting. Good to Go. [[User:Drchriswilliams|Drchriswilliams]] ([[User talk:Drchriswilliams|talk]]) 15:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:32, 18 October 2016
DYK toolbox |
---|
Black grasswren
- ... that although the black grasswren was discovered in 1901, it was not seen again until 1968? source: [1]
- ALT1:...that although the black grasswren was discovered in 1901, its nesting habits remained unknown till 1998? Source: [2]
5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 14:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC).
This article was created in 2007 and has been recently expanded. The sequence of edits made between 15 and 17 October increased the prose of the main text by x5. There are no outstanding maintenance issues affecting the article. There are five good-quality sources used, these are distributed across the article. Checking against the sources used there is no copyright violation or close violation apparent, although I note one source is a book where there is no link to check this online and good faith is assumed. There is no image included in this nomination. QPQ has been declared. The text within the article is written in a neutral tone and appears policy compliant. The hooks suggested are short-enough, neutral and interesting. Both hooks have appropriate citations. I find ALT1 more interesting. Good to Go. Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC)