Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Bro (subculture)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>97198 m (gr) |
imported>Muboshgu (review) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* I'm surprised we didn't have an article on "bro's" before this. Article was created in early April in userspace and moved to mainspace the same day, if I'm reading that right. It's long enough, sourced enough (though more sources would make it a stronger article, I'd hold you to that if this was a GAR). Given that only four sources are used and two of them are used several times, I ran Duplication Detector on those two. Phrases that are close are in quotation marks, so acceptable.[http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBro_%28subculture%29&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.oxforddictionaries.com%2F2013%2F10%2Fthe-rise-of-the-portmanbro%2F&minwords=2&minchars=13][http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBro_%28subculture%29&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.npr.org%2Fblogs%2Fcodeswitch%2F2013%2F06%2F21%2F193881290%2Fjeah-we-mapped-out-the-four-basic-aspects-of-being-a-bro&minwords=2&minchars=13] Image is free and used in the article, but there might be better images of frat boys available on Commons than that one. QPQ done, good to go. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 14:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:15, 22 April 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bro (subculture)
- ... that the bro (frat boys pictured) in "don't tase me, bro" is not the taser, but the tased?
- ALT1: ... that the bro (frat boys pictured) in "don't tase me, bro" is not the person being called a bro?
- Reviewed: Durham's Chapel School
Created by Czar (talk). Self nominated at 01:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC).
- I'm surprised we didn't have an article on "bro's" before this. Article was created in early April in userspace and moved to mainspace the same day, if I'm reading that right. It's long enough, sourced enough (though more sources would make it a stronger article, I'd hold you to that if this was a GAR). Given that only four sources are used and two of them are used several times, I ran Duplication Detector on those two. Phrases that are close are in quotation marks, so acceptable.[1][2] Image is free and used in the article, but there might be better images of frat boys available on Commons than that one. QPQ done, good to go. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
