Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cabal of Naples"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sctechlaw
(review)
imported>Sctechlaw
(forgot stuff on hook)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
:::*I think you meant to strike ALT1. <font color="#8b4513">[[User:Mindmatrix|Mind]]</font><font color="#ee8811">[[User_talk:Mindmatrix|matrix]]</font> 21:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*I think you meant to strike ALT1. <font color="#8b4513">[[User:Mindmatrix|Mind]]</font><font color="#ee8811">[[User_talk:Mindmatrix|matrix]]</font> 21:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  You're absolutely right; I should have struck ALT1. My apologies for the error; thanks for fixing it. ALT2's length is fine. Reviewer for nomination still requested. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  You're absolutely right; I should have struck ALT1. My apologies for the error; thanks for fixing it. ALT2's length is fine. Reviewer for nomination still requested. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Prose size (text only): 4025 B on Jan 1, up from 0 as this is a new article created Dec 27, thus date and size are ok. No close paraphrasing for online cites (actually I fixed one during review, but the others I could check were ok); offline refs accepted AGF; QPQ done. Original hook, imo, is ''much'' more interesting than ALT2. I added an image to the article during review. This article appears ready to go. &mdash; [[User:Sctechlaw|Sctechlaw]] ([[User talk:Sctechlaw|talk]]) 12:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
+
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Prose size (text only): 4025 B on Jan 1, up from 0 as this is a new article created Dec 27, thus date and size are ok. No close paraphrasing for online cites (actually I fixed one during review, but the others I could check were ok); offline refs accepted AGF; QPQ done. Original hook, imo, is ''much'' more interesting than ALT2. Paragraphs are adequately cited; using original hook means tweaking hook/cite, which should be easy enough to do by using a short and separate lead. I added an image to the article during review. This article appears ready to go for ALT2, but if the more interesting, original hook is used, it needs the hook, as phrased, and cite in the lead. &mdash; [[User:Sctechlaw|Sctechlaw]] ([[User talk:Sctechlaw|talk]]) 12:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:19, 10 January 2013

Cabal of Naples

  • ... that in the early 1600s, the notorious triumvirate Cabal of Naples led painters of the city to harass, expel, or poison any non-native painter so that commissions would be won by local artists?

Created by Mindmatrix (talk). Self nom at 17:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg The user has half a dozen DYKs from 2008 and a couple since, so a quid pro quo (QPQ) review of another DYK submission is required in order for this nomination to be eligible for approval. The reviewing guide is here, and the DYK general rules are here with clarifications here. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Striking ALT2 as it's over the maximum length; it has 208 characters. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I think you meant to strike ALT1. Mindmatrix 21:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png You're absolutely right; I should have struck ALT1. My apologies for the error; thanks for fixing it. ALT2's length is fine. Reviewer for nomination still requested. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Prose size (text only): 4025 B on Jan 1, up from 0 as this is a new article created Dec 27, thus date and size are ok. No close paraphrasing for online cites (actually I fixed one during review, but the others I could check were ok); offline refs accepted AGF; QPQ done. Original hook, imo, is much more interesting than ALT2. Paragraphs are adequately cited; using original hook means tweaking hook/cite, which should be easy enough to do by using a short and separate lead. I added an image to the article during review. This article appears ready to go for ALT2, but if the more interesting, original hook is used, it needs the hook, as phrased, and cite in the lead. — Sctechlaw (talk) 12:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)