Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cape Wickham Links"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Casliber
(nominated)
 
imported>Drchriswilliams
(review added)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article is new, created 3 October and self-nominated on 7 October. The main prose of the article is long enough, neutral and appears policy compliant. There is use of inline citations appropriately across the article. While one online source is subscription-only, there is is no obvious copyright violation or close paraphrasing apparent. Both hooks are short enough, appropriately sourced and policy compliant; I prefer ALT1 which appears more interesting. QPQ has been declared. There is no image supplied, but I note the comment highlighting the possibility that one might be identified, so please ping me if one is added. Otherwise this DYK is good to go. [[User:Drchriswilliams|Drchriswilliams]] ([[User talk:Drchriswilliams|talk]]) 08:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 08:07, 11 October 2016

Cape Wickham Links

Created by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 02:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg The article is new, created 3 October and self-nominated on 7 October. The main prose of the article is long enough, neutral and appears policy compliant. There is use of inline citations appropriately across the article. While one online source is subscription-only, there is is no obvious copyright violation or close paraphrasing apparent. Both hooks are short enough, appropriately sourced and policy compliant; I prefer ALT1 which appears more interesting. QPQ has been declared. There is no image supplied, but I note the comment highlighting the possibility that one might be identified, so please ping me if one is added. Otherwise this DYK is good to go. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)