Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas white-eye"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (requesting more specifics regarding review) |
imported>Shuipzv3 (Reply) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I think it's good to go. [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 14:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I think it's good to go. [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 14:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]], please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC) | ::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]], please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::* Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 11:49, 11 December 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
Christmas white-eye
- ... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced its risk of extinction?
- ALT1:... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?
- Reviewed: Germania Life Insurance Company Building
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
-
Shuipzv3, please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)