Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Coccus hesperidum"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(restoring braces before final template comment)
imported>97198
(to prep2)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 10:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Coccus hesperidum====
 
====Coccus hesperidum====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Coccus hesperidum|Coccus hesperidum}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Coccus hesperidum|Coccus hesperidum}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that male '''[[Coccus hesperidum|brown soft scale insects]]''' are rarely found?
 
* ... that male '''[[Coccus hesperidum|brown soft scale insects]]''' are rarely found?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Elder Statesman (brand)|The Elder Statesman (brand)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Elder Statesman (brand)|The Elder Statesman (brand)]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self nominated at 07:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self nominated at 07:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Coccus hesperidum|Cwmhiraeth}}
 
-->
 
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article created on 7 December as stated, has 3306 characters, is neutral and cites reliable sources. The hook is enticing but ultimately disappointing because the article doesn't explain why the male of the species is so rare. Still, there's no rule about that, so it's good to go.--[[User:Ykraps|Ykraps]] ([[User talk:Ykraps|talk]]) 01:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article created on 7 December as stated, has 3306 characters, is neutral and cites reliable sources. The hook is enticing but ultimately disappointing because the article doesn't explain why the male of the species is so rare. Still, there's no rule about that, so it's good to go.--[[User:Ykraps|Ykraps]] ([[User talk:Ykraps|talk]]) 01:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 10:01, 14 December 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Coccus hesperidum

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 07:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article created on 7 December as stated, has 3306 characters, is neutral and cites reliable sources. The hook is enticing but ultimately disappointing because the article doesn't explain why the male of the species is so rare. Still, there's no rule about that, so it's good to go.--Ykraps (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)