Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Constantin Doncea"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(avoid repetition)
imported>Carabinieri
(good to go)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Everything in the article looks to be in order, length, sources, close paraphrasing unlikely since the sources are all in Romanian (although the article could use a little copyediting - everything is very comprehensible though). I like the original hook best. There is the small issue of the DYK rules having that strange provision that the article have a footnote with a reference right after the hook fact. Other than that, this looks good to go.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 11:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Everything in the article looks to be in order, length, sources, close paraphrasing unlikely since the sources are all in Romanian (although the article could use a little copyediting - everything is very comprehensible though). I like the original hook best. There is the small issue of the DYK rules having that strange provision that the article have a footnote with a reference right after the hook fact. Other than that, this looks good to go.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 11:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Issue has been taken care of.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 14:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:04, 8 October 2014

Constantin Doncea

Created by Biruitorul (talk). Self nominated at 15:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC).

  • 16px Everything in the article looks to be in order, length, sources, close paraphrasing unlikely since the sources are all in Romanian (although the article could use a little copyediting - everything is very comprehensible though). I like the original hook best. There is the small issue of the DYK rules having that strange provision that the article have a footnote with a reference right after the hook fact. Other than that, this looks good to go.--Carabinieri (talk) 11:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)