Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dadi Nicolas"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>DYKReviewBot
m (Automatically reviewing nomination: No issues found (Problems? Report it.))
imported>Earthh
(reviewed)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.</noinclude> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 18:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.</noinclude> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 18:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 
<!-- End automated review -->
 
<!-- End automated review -->
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Expanded more than five times, the article is long enough and well referenced, hook is reliably cited. No copyright violations detected, QPQ done. Good to go. [[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 21:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:34, 26 August 2016

Dadi Nicolas

5x expanded by Church (talk). Self-nominated at 09:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This biographical article has been expanded from 334 chars to 5620 chars since 19:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC), a 16.83-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 5620 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 24.8% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Expanded more than five times, the article is long enough and well referenced, hook is reliably cited. No copyright violations detected, QPQ done. Good to go. Earthh (talk) 21:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)